Both sites put through the same seven checks
Zula vs Pulsz
Zula scores 73 against 71. Its biggest edge is support, ahead by 30 points.
The short answer, in three questions
- Which one do we rate safer overall?
- Zula
- Total Trust Score Zula 73 · Pulsz 71
- Which one is easier to cash out from?
- Pulsz
- Redemption reliability Zula 67 · Pulsz 79
- Which one have we proved more about?
- Both sides
- Cashouts that landed Zula 1 · Pulsz 3
On total trust, Zula leads by 2 points. The factor table below shows where that lead comes from, and where Pulsz is stronger.
What separates these two
The widest scored gap is support: Zula leads by 30 points.
- Redemption minimum differs: Zula $50, Pulsz $100.
Choose Zula if support is your priority.
Choose Pulsz if track record is your priority.
Factor by factor
A factor is one of the seven things we score. Edge names the site with the higher score on that factor, and by how much. A tie stays a tie. Where we have not scored a factor on both sides it reads as not scored yet, which is a gap in our work and never a zero for the site.
| Factor | Zula | Pulsz | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | 67 | 79 | Pulsz by 12 |
| KYC fairness | 80 | 90 | Pulsz by 10 |
| Terms honesty | 50 | 25 | Zula by 25 |
| Playthrough | 100 | 83 | Zula by 17 |
| Track record | 68 | 92 | Pulsz by 24 |
| Player reviews | 96 | 83 | Zula by 13 |
| Support | 65 | 35 | Zula by 30 Widest lead |
What we actually tested
- Test sessions logged4
- Cashout records1
- Cashouts that landed1
- Paid out to us$700
- Cashouts we timed1
- Fastest one to land3.0d
- Typical wait (median)3.0d
- KYCin progress
- Last testedAug 11, 2026
- Test sessions logged4
- Cashout records3
- Cashouts that landed3
- Paid out to us$410
- Cashouts we timed3
- Fastest one to land24h
- Typical wait (median)36h
- KYCverified
- Last testedAug 1, 2026
Both sites have paid us at least once, with our own money, so this is receipts against receipts. Zula: 1 confirmed payout totaling $700. Delivery time 3 days on 1 timed payout. Pulsz: 3 confirmed payouts totaling $410. Delivery time 1.0d to 4.0d across 3 timed payouts.
These figures come from the same corpus as the sweepstakes payout study, our running log of every cash-out we request with our own money.
We may earn a commission if you sign up or purchase through a Visit link. Commissions never affect any score. How the links work
Sign-up bonus
GC are Gold Coins: play money, never worth cash. SC are Sweeps Coins: those are the ones that can be turned into money, once you have played them through and reached the site's cash-out minimum. A bigger pile of GC is not more money.
120,000 GC + 10 SC Conditions apply. No purchase necessary. 18+ only.
5,000 GC Sign-up Gold Coins; daily login prizes are separate
What players report
- Trustpilot reviews33,733
- 1-2 star share7%
- CheckedJul 3, 2026
Recurring themes reviewers raise: account closures, game disputes, KYC problems, redemption delays, unresponsive support.
- Trustpilot reviews28,565
- 1-2 star share13%
- CheckedJul 3, 2026
Recurring themes reviewers raise: account closures, game disputes, KYC problems, redemption delays, unresponsive support.
The review counts and the share of 1 and 2 star ratings come straight from each site's public Trustpilot page, refreshed on a rolling schedule. The complaint index has the same measure for every casino we rate.
Where to play each
Zula accepts players in 29 of the states we track, Pulsz in 35. Confirm your own state before signing up. See the state tracker →
The practical differences
These are separate operations in our records: Zula is operated by SCPS LLC and Pulsz by Yellow Social Interactive Limited, so the factor gaps above compare two different companies, not one owner's two skins.
The cash-out bar is not the same: Zula lets you request a redemption from $50, while Pulsz makes you reach $100 first. If you play small, that gap decides which side actually pays you.
Both keep a documented no-purchase entry route open (mail-in postcard), which is the baseline a legitimate sweepstakes has to meet.
Zula: minimum redemption $50. payout methods not confirmed yet. operated by SCPS LLC.
Pulsz: minimum redemption $100. payout methods not confirmed yet. operated by Yellow Social Interactive Limited.
Score movement in the last 90 days
Zula: Jul 31, 2026: Support 25 to 65 · Jul 3, 2026: Player reviews 57 to 96
Pulsz: Aug 13, 2026: Complaint penalty -4 to 0 · Jul 31, 2026: Terms honesty 47 to 25 · Jul 3, 2026: Player reviews 68 to 83
Every adjustment is logged publicly. The change log has the full history with reasons.
Zula vs Pulsz: common questions
Which scores higher, Zula or Pulsz?
Zula leads 73 to 71 on our 7-factor trust audit, a gap of 2 points. The gap is widest on support, where the lead is 30 points.
Have we been paid by Zula or Pulsz?
Both sites have paid us at least once, with our own money, so this is receipts against receipts. Zula: 1 confirmed payout totaling $700. Delivery time 3 days on 1 timed payout. Pulsz: 3 confirmed payouts totaling $410. Delivery time 1.0d to 4.0d across 3 timed payouts.
Which has faster redemption, Zula or Pulsz?
On cashouts we watched land, Pulsz was faster: 24h against 3.0d.
Which gets better player reviews?
Zula gets the better player reviews on our reviews factor: Zula 96 out of 100 against Pulsz 83 out of 100.
Which has more player complaints, Zula or Pulsz?
Zula has the smaller share of negative reviews. 7% of Zula's 33,733 public reviews are 1 or 2 stars, against 13% of Pulsz's 28,565.
Where can I play Zula and Pulsz?
Zula accepts players in 29 of the states we track, Pulsz in 35. Confirm your own state before signing up. Check your state
Continue comparing
Full evidence: Zula review + score history · Pulsz review + score history · how scoring works · casinos that actually paid
Availability varies by state. Check yours before signing up with either.