OPERATOR REVIEW · The Roost Limited
Cluck
18+ minimum age per Cluck's terms 19+ where state law is higher (AL, NE) state floors and our 21+ readership
The short answer
Cluck
A delivery is recorded without amount or method; current rules make accurate prize details especially important when payment fails.
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
View evidence or compare ↓Visit PlayFame instead →
We may earn a commission if you sign up or purchase through this link. It does not affect the score. Disclosure
Latest evidence or editorial update: .
- Where you can play
- 28 states
- Pick your state to see the answer for you.
- What we cashed out
- 1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded
- How solid our proof is
- Low
- Preliminary evidence
The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.
See all the details
- Where our review stands
- Reviewed
- Written verdict published. 3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence an editor approved.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. 1 more carries an automated draft that no editor has signed off yet.
What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not
- Human-confirmed payouts 1 First-hand test
- Owner on record The Roost Limited Ownership record
The verdict
Cluck has a confirmed dated delivery, but no amount, payment method, or measured elapsed time is recorded. An additional requested entry is unmatched and remains outside the payout total.
The current terms distinguish Cluck Bucks from Gold Coins and contain a material returned-prize clause: coins corresponding to a refused, returned, or undeliverable prize are not restored. We have not tested that provision or linked it to the unmatched request.
The expanded notes explain route details, possible fees, manual review, and the complaint procedure. The historical success supports a narrow payment claim, while the missing receipt fields prevent a cash-route or speed comparison. A retry or returned balance should never be assumed from the existence of the earlier delivery.
General information only, not financial or legal advice. Rules, thresholds, and offers can change; consult an appropriate professional about your circumstances.
First-hand evidence
One redemption we ran with Cluck
- Received
- May 27, 2026
Delivered
- Amount not recorded
- Method not recorded
- Payout time not measured
The complete first-hand record
First-hand tests
Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.
Most recent test Jun 1, 2026. First-hand result: 1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded.
Reconciled payout record
Counts and amounts for the rows shown below
| Outcome | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Confirmed delivered | 1 | No amounts recorded |
| Additional attempts or unmatched records | 1 | No amounts recorded |
Only confirmed delivered payouts produce a payout figure anywhere on this page.
Confirmed delivered payouts
1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded
| Received | Amount | Method | Time to pay |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not measured |
Incomplete detail on 1 of 1: each gap is labelled on its row, and a figure we do not hold is left out of the totals rather than counted as zero.
Additional attempts or unmatched records
1 record, none counted as a payout
| State | Requested | Amount requested | Incomplete evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requested, not received | Not recorded | Not recorded | Amount not recorded · Method not recorded |
These are records we hold, not payouts. A redemption we requested but never watched land is not proof that Cluck paid it, and a record we cannot read is not proof of anything, so nothing in this table feeds a total, a median, a payout time, or any payout wording on this page.
Notes & evidence (1)
Cash-out proof
1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded
- Payout received May 27, 2026amount not recorded
Method not recorded · Payout time not measured
Public receipt copy
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. 1 more carries an automated draft that no editor has signed off yet. Editorial review completed July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.
Is Cluck legit? The short version
A delivery is recorded without amount or method; current rules make accurate prize details especially important when payment fails. Among its highest-scoring factors is Playthrough (83/100); its lowest is Terms honesty (13/100).
HIGHER FACTOR SCORES
- Playthrough 83
How burdensome are wagering requirements?
- Player reviews 83
(2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.7/5 over 52 reviews (25% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping.…
- KYC fairness 80
Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?
LOWER FACTOR SCORES
- Terms honesty 13
Do the terms match what the marketing implies?
- Redemption reliability 47
Current first-hand record: 1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded
- Track record 60
Current first-hand record: 1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 47 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 80 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 13 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 83 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 60 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 83 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 70 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 58
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 58
- → Caution
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. Methodology v1: applicable rules.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Cluck in its band.
Redemption reliability 47
Current first-hand record: 1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded See source details
47/100, weak (below 50).
Scoring rationale recorded 2026-07-31 (historical)
First-hand log records 1 delivered redemption from 1 request. Score retained pending full rubric review.
- Review date
- July 31, 2026
- Reviewer state
- Human authored
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Terms honesty 13 Evidence in review
Evidence in review
We are reviewing evidence for this factor. It is not verified yet.
Playthrough 83 Evidence in review
Evidence in review
We are reviewing evidence for this factor. It is not verified yet.
Track record 60
Current first-hand record: 1 confirmed payout, no amounts recorded See source details
60/100, mixed (50–69).
Scoring rationale recorded 2026-06-19 (historical)
Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- Review date
- June 19, 2026
- Reviewer state
- Human authored
- Sample size
- 1 cashout
- Some source dates are not recorded.
- The sample is small, so read the result as indicative, not typical.
First-hand redemptions:
- Redemption: requested, not received
- Paid
Player reviews 83
83/100, strong (70–100).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.
(2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.7/5 over 52 reviews (25% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cluck.us
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Support 70
70/100, strong (70–100).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.
Trustpilot mentions 'customers had ambiguous experiences with customer service, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness'. Another source says support is via live chat and email, with live chat being quicker. No reports of long delays or no response.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Cluck: an incomplete receipt and a consequential returned-prize clause
Cluck’s record confirms delivery on May 27, 2026, but the row lacks an amount, payment method, and measured timing. An additional requested entry has no confirmed arrival. The delivered outcome should remain visible, while the unmatched request stays outside the payout total.
The incomplete receipt limits the review in practical ways. It cannot show whether the prize was a gift card or cash, how long the request took, or how much money arrived. A general statement that Cluck has paid is supported; a claim about a particular route or fast processing is not.
Match a returned-prize problem to its destination
| Route described in the September 7 terms record | Details that identify the issue |
|---|---|
| Gift card | Registered email, delivery notice and any return or refusal notice |
| Cash | Selected payment account, ownership confirmation and the bank’s return reason |
| Unmatched request in our record | Request amount, method and final outcome are still missing |
The returned-prize clause concerns what happens after a prize cannot be delivered. It does not establish why the unmatched request on this page lacks a receipt. A support answer linking the exact transaction to that clause would be needed before attributing a balance loss to it.
Cluck Bucks and Gold Coins have different roles
The current terms, updated August 21, 2026 and reviewed September 7, distinguish Cluck Bucks used for promotional play from Gold Coins used for entertainment. Gold Coins cannot be redeemed for prizes. The rulebook describes specific ways to obtain promotional entries, including marked purchase packages and no-cost opportunities.
A purchase window must therefore identify the promotional component explicitly. A Gold Coin amount alone does not establish a prize-eligible allocation. We have no complete first-hand purchase package in this record that would verify a current welcome offer.
The terms also give promotional Sweeps Coins a validity period measured from crediting if they are not used for gameplay. That differs from the account’s separate inactivity definition. We have not tested expiry, and an expiry clause should not be treated as encouragement to play more.
Returned prizes may not restore the coins
Section 7.9 says that if a prize is refused, returned, or cannot be delivered, the corresponding Cluck Bucks will not be restored to the account. This is a consequential published condition. We have not tested its enforcement or established that it affected our unmatched request.
That makes the final request details particularly important. For gift cards, the rules use the registered email. For cash, they describe the purchasing payment method or, where technically necessary, an alternative financial account legally and beneficially owned by the user.
A reader seeing a returned payment should ask the operator to identify the return reason and the clause applied before assuming the account balance will reset for another attempt. The current rule differs from platforms that explicitly return coins after a cancelled request. Our evidence does not justify promising such a return here.
The processing estimate includes manual-review qualifications
The terms describe a short ordinary processing estimate and a longer typical period for manual review, with an email notice if a request is held. They reserve further time for additional verification. Those are policy descriptions, not speed measured in our Cluck test.
The same section reserves processing fees and redemption limits. The selected route’s net amount and any deduction need to be visible before the request is confirmed. Reaching a balance threshold does not establish that fees, document checks, and payment compatibility are resolved.
The winner-verification section also distinguishes a displayed win from a verified prize. A screen can document what the account showed, but the rulebook requires completion of the operator’s validation process. Our May receipt confirms one delivered outcome without showing every preceding step.
A complaint should identify the disputed request
The terms direct complaints through the registered account email with identifying details, a description, and relevant dates. They state an ordinary response target of five calendar days, with some cases taking up to ten and a delay notice within three.
For the unmatched request in our record, the missing information is still basic: what was requested, when, through which route, and whether it arrived. A complaint or follow-up should identify those events rather than infer them from a general balance.
General information only, not financial or legal advice. Rules, thresholds, and offers can change; consult an appropriate professional about your circumstances.
BonusBandit editorial · updated September 9, 2026. First-hand results come from our recorded tests. Operator rules and correspondence are separately attributed and dated in these notes.
Terms and offer facts
- Minimum redemption
- $100 catalog median $100
- States accepted
- 28
Read off Cluck's own terms. Cluck Terms of Service ↗
Where Cluck accepts players
AK · AL · AR · CO · DC · GA · HI · IA · KS · MA · MN · MO · MS · NC · ND · NE · NH · NM · OH · OR · RI · SC · SD · TX · VA · VT · WI · WY
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Bonus & features
Site features as observed Jun 15, 2026 · source (cluck.us) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
Recurring promotions
2 ongoing
- Daily FREE DAILY REWARDS : Spin the wheel from the Daily Login Calendar
- Ongoing REFER A FRIEND : 10CB when your friend makes their first purchase
Site features
- Game catalog
- 90 table games
- Support
- Live chat 24/7
- Loyalty / VIP
- VIP
- Banking
- cardcrypto
What's a purchase really worth?
We do not yet have enough first-hand evidence to estimate purchase value, effective playthrough, or redemption success for this operator.
What we hold for Cluck: 0 logged packages · 0 completed purchase-to-payout cycles · 1 delivered redemption.
We model coin value only from packages we paid for ourselves, and only once there is a payout record showing the coins can be collected. Until we have bought and logged a coin package at Cluck, there is nothing here to model from.
What the factor scores do say: our terms review scores this operator's playthrough language at 83/100, and redemption reliability scores 47/100. A playthrough score rates how squarely the terms commit to a wagering multiplier, not the wagering you would face. A redemption score rates whether payouts arrive and arrive on time, not a share of your money coming back. Neither one can stand in for the tests we have not run here. See the methodology.
Risk timeline
-
Support: 50 → 70 (+20). Rubric reassessed
-
Player reviews: 57 → 83 (+26). (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.7/5 over 52 reviews (25% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cluck.us
-
Track record: 75 → 60 (-15). Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Ownership
Operating entity on record: The Roost Limited. That is what the corporate record and the operator's own terms show, which is not the same as knowing who runs the brand day to day.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-31 Redemption reliability: 47 → 47.
- 2026-07-31 Support: 50 → 70.
- 2026-07-03 Player reviews: 57 → 83. (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.7/5 over 52 reviews (25% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/cluck.us
Show the full history (2 earlier changes)
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 75 → 60. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like Cluck
Each one beats Cluck on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.
-
CrownCoins
73/100 TRUSTED VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026We have watched more payouts land
We have watched 28 payouts land from CrownCoins, against 1 from Cluck.
-
HelloMillions
73/100 TRUSTED VERIFIED AUG 13, 2026Better score for paying out
HelloMillions scores 87 out of 100 for paying out, against 47 for Cluck.
-
Gains
73/100 TRUSTED VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for honest terms
Gains scores 75 out of 100 for honest terms, against 13 for Cluck.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your Cluck experience
Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.
- You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
- A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
- If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for Cluck. Some reports get logged and never published.
No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.