The short answer
Scrooge
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
See safer alternatives ↓Visit PlayFame instead →
Affiliate link. Never affects the score. Disclosure
- How solid our proof is
- Medium
- Useful but incomplete evidence
- Where our review stands
- Tested
- First-hand account activity documented, but the editorial review is incomplete.
The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved. 3 more carry automated drafts that no editor has signed off yet.
What could go wrong
-
Avoid tier
Scrooge scores 38 out of 100, inside our avoid band.
Our score log Checked 2026-07-31 Published Trust Score 38 out of 100.
What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not
- Operator terms reviewed June 15, 2026 Operator terms
This operator's evidence fingerprint
A compact read of the records that make this review different. Unknown means the evidence is not recorded here, not that the operator failed the test.
- Evidence coverage
- 6 of 7 factor inputs have verified evidence coverage; 1 evidence gap remains
- Public record
- Unknown: no recorded event count; 10 score-history entries
Reader decision: Use the factor inputs with verified evidence coverage for Scrooge as the starting point. A delivered payout is unknown from the records shown here.
Where this review stands
No written verdict on Scrooge has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and Scrooge hasn't cleared that queue. The score below reflects an individual re-verification, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track Scrooge's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.
First-hand evidence
The complete first-hand record
First-hand tests
Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.
Most recent test Aug 18, 2026.
Test logged; redemption, purchase, and daily-bonus details are being added.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved. 3 more carry automated drafts that no editor has signed off yet. Score last verified July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.
Scrooge: what we know so far
Scrooge's strongest signal is KYC fairness at 70/100. The biggest concern is Player reviews at 22/100.
STRENGTHS
- KYC fairness 70
Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?
- Terms honesty 45
The ToS includes a prominent class-action waiver and mandatory individual arbitration clause (with an opt-out), which is a significant transparency…
These Terms and Conditions include a provision that waives your right to engage in any class, group, or representative claims. Instead, disputes between you and us must be resolved through individual arbitration unless you choose to opt out within the specified timeframe.
- Playthrough 40
The ToS states that any Sweeps Coin allocated to you needs to be played once before redemption, but also reserves the right to require up to 20x…
any Sweeps Coin allocated to you needs to be played once before it is eligible for redemption as a Prize. We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to require any Sweeps Token allocated to you to be played a greater number of times (not exceeding 20) in any combination of Promotional Play Games before it is eligible for redemption as a Prize.
WATCHOUTS
- Player reviews 22
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were…
- Track record 23
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were…
- Redemption reliability 29
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were…
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 29 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 70 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 45 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 40 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 23 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 22 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 40 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 38
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 38
- → Avoid
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Scrooge in its band.
Redemption reliability 29
29/100, weak (below 50).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered redemption/cashout accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- Some source dates are not recorded.
KYC fairness 70
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Terms honesty 45
45/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
The Terms honesty factor (0-100): Scoring framework for terms transparency: - 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible - 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps - 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading - 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins - 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses (refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, indefinite KYC freezes)
Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 15, 2026.
The ToS includes a prominent class-action waiver and mandatory individual arbitration clause (with an opt-out), which is a significant transparency issue per the rubric. Redemption rules are present but contain buried caveats (e.g., playthrough requirements up to 20x, daily caps, and forfeiture provisions). The language is mostly clear but contains several player-hostile elements like the ability to void games at sole discretion and broad account closure powers.
These Terms and Conditions include a provision that waives your right to engage in any class, group, or representative claims. Instead, disputes between you and us must be resolved through individual arbitration unless you choose to opt out within the specified timeframe.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Playthrough 40
40/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
The Playthrough factor (0-100): Scoring framework for wagering requirements: - 90-100: no playthrough OR <=1x on Sweeps Coins purchased entries - 70-89: 1-3x WR on SC - 50-69: 3-5x WR on SC - 30-49: 5-10x WR on SC OR confusing GC/SC mixing - 0-29: >=10x WR on SC OR "lifetime" wagering caps OR unrecoverable bonus locks
Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 15, 2026.
The ToS states that any Sweeps Coin allocated to you needs to be played once before redemption, but also reserves the right to require up to 20x playthrough. This 1-20x range falls into the 5-10x or confusing GC/SC mixing category, but since the base is 1x with a possible increase up to 20x, the most conservative score is in the 30-49 range for confusing or potentially high WR.
any Sweeps Coin allocated to you needs to be played once before it is eligible for redemption as a Prize. We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to require any Sweeps Token allocated to you to be played a greater number of times (not exceeding 20) in any combination of Promotional Play Games before it is eligible for redemption as a Prize.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Track record 23
23/100, weak (below 50).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered track record accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Player reviews 22
22/100, weak (below 50).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered player reviews accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Support 40
40/100, weak (below 50).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.
Support quality is inconsistent: one source claims 24/7 top-notch service, but another reports slow response times and not 24/7. A player complaint on LCB indicates a withdrawal issue, and a Reddit post mentions account banning after complaints. Overall, support appears unreliable.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Bonus & features
We haven’t researched this yet.
We haven’t logged Scrooge’s current daily bonus, purchase bundles, or feature set yet. We won’t guess. Bonus values change constantly, so we only publish them with the date and source page we read them from. Know the current offers? Send a tip →
What's the daily bonus really worth?
We haven't measured Scrooge's daily bonus yet. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus after logging the real coins first-hand, day after day, never from marketing copy.
Played here? Tell us what its daily bonus pays and we'll test it ourselves. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.
Risk timeline
-
Player reviews: 43 → 22 (-21). Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered player reviews accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
-
Redemption reliability: 50 → 29 (-21). Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered redemption/cashout accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
-
Track record: 50 → 35 (-15). Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-31 Support: 50 → 40.
- 2026-07-03 Track record: 35 → 23. Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered track record accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- 2026-07-03 Player reviews: 43 → 22. Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered player reviews accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
Show the full history (7 earlier changes)
- 2026-07-03 Redemption reliability: 50 → 29. Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account closures, verification problems (100% of 22 sampled reviews were negative). Lowered redemption/cashout accordingly.. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 35 → 25. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. Track-record factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 70 → 60. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. KYC factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 50 → 35. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-15 Terms honesty: → 45. (wayback ToS recovery), explicitly approved by Noah.
- 2026-06-15 Playthrough: → 40. (wayback ToS recovery), explicitly approved by Noah.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like Scrooge
Each one beats Scrooge on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.
-
Legendz
53/100 CAUTION VERIFIED AUG 13, 2026We have watched more payouts land
We have watched 1 payout land from Legendz, against none from Scrooge.
-
Tangluck
53/100 CAUTION BASELINE JUL 3, 2026Better score for paying out
Tangluck scores 62 out of 100 for paying out, against 29 for Scrooge.
-
CoinsBucks
53/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for paying out
CoinsBucks scores 60 out of 100 for paying out, against 29 for Scrooge.
Sites like Scrooge: common questions
What are sites like Scrooge?
The closest by Trust Score are VegasGlory, VegasBonanza, CoinsBucks, each within 15 points of Scrooge's 38/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like Scrooge" page.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your Scrooge experience
Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.
- You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
- A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
- If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for Scrooge. Some reports get logged and never published.
No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.