Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
Is Scrooge legit? The short version
Scrooge's strongest signal is KYC fairness at 70/100. The biggest concern is Player reviews at 22/100.
STRENGTHS
- KYC fairness 70
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land…
- Support 50
Response quality when something goes wrong
- Terms honesty 45
The ToS includes a prominent class-action waiver and mandatory individual arbitration clause (with an opt-out), which is a significant transparency…
These Terms and Conditions include a provision that waives your right to engage in any class, group, or representative claims. Instead, disputes between you and us must be resolved through individual arbitration unless you choose to opt out within the specified timeframe.
WATCHOUTS
- Player reviews 22
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered player…
- Track record 23
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered track record…
- Redemption reliability 29
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered…
Where this review stands
No written verdict on Scrooge has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and Scrooge hasn't cleared that queue. The score below is the June 2026 baseline, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track Scrooge's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
Score from our automated rubric. Full editorial review pending. What this means.
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 29 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 70 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 45 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 40 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 23 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 22 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 39
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 39
- → Avoid
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Scrooge in its band.
Redemption reliability 29
29/100, weak (below 50).
Logged change
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered redemption/cashout accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
KYC fairness 70
70/100, strong (70–100).
Logged change
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
Terms honesty 45
45/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
f_tos_honesty (0-100) — Scoring framework for terms transparency: - 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible - 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps - 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading - 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins - 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses (refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, indefinite KYC freezes)
AI-drafted from ToS (DeepSeek), approved by Noah Jun 15, 2026
The ToS includes a prominent class-action waiver and mandatory individual arbitration clause (with an opt-out), which is a significant transparency issue per the rubric. Redemption rules are present but contain buried caveats (e.g., playthrough requirements up to 20x, daily caps, and forfeiture provisions). The language is mostly clear but contains several player-hostile elements like the ability to void games at sole discretion and broad account closure powers.
These Terms and Conditions include a provision that waives your right to engage in any class, group, or representative claims. Instead, disputes between you and us must be resolved through individual arbitration unless you choose to opt out within the specified timeframe.
Playthrough 40
40/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
f_playthrough (0-100) — Scoring framework for wagering requirements: - 90-100: no playthrough OR <=1x on Sweeps Coins purchased entries - 70-89: 1-3x WR on SC - 50-69: 3-5x WR on SC - 30-49: 5-10x WR on SC OR confusing GC/SC mixing - 0-29: >=10x WR on SC OR "lifetime" wagering caps OR unrecoverable bonus locks
AI-drafted from ToS (DeepSeek), approved by Noah Jun 15, 2026
The ToS states that any Sweeps Coin allocated to you needs to be played once before redemption, but also reserves the right to require up to 20x playthrough. This 1-20x range falls into the 5-10x or confusing GC/SC mixing category, but since the base is 1x with a possible increase up to 20x, the most conservative score is in the 30-49 range for confusing or potentially high WR.
any Sweeps Coin allocated to you needs to be played once before it is eligible for redemption as a Prize. We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to require any Sweeps Token allocated to you to be played a greater number of times (not exceeding 20) in any combination of Promotional Play Games before it is eligible for redemption as a Prize.
Track record 23
23/100, weak (below 50).
Logged change
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered track record accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
Player reviews 22
22/100, weak (below 50).
Logged change
Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered player reviews accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
Support 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for Scrooge yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
Where Scrooge accepts players
No verified state-availability data yet.
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Risk timeline
-
Player reviews: 43 → 22 (-21) — Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered player reviews accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
-
Redemption reliability: 50 → 29 (-21) — Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered redemption/cashout accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
-
Track record: 50 → 35 (-15) — Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric — applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Bonus & features
We haven’t researched this yet.
We haven’t logged Scrooge’s current daily bonus, purchase bundles, or feature set yet. We won’t guess. Bonus values change constantly, so we only publish them with the date and source page we read them from. Know the current offers? Send a tip →
What's the daily bonus really worth?
We haven't measured Scrooge's daily bonus yet. No first-hand daily-bonus log and nothing sourced from its promotions page. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus once we've recorded the real coins, never from marketing.
Played here? Report what its daily bonus pays and it'll feed this estimate. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.
First-hand tests
Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.
Not yet tested by Noah
Scrooge is in the testing queue: a real account, a real deposit, and a real redemption, documented start to finish. Until then, the score above leans on player reports and primary-source terms.
What's a purchase really worth?
We haven't bought a coin package at Scrooge and logged it yet, so there's no first-hand purchase data to model real coin value from. We only calculate value from packages we've actually paid for and recorded. Never from the operator's marketing.
What the score already tells you: payouts return about 29% of theoretical value · play-through burden is 6.0×. See the methodology.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-03 Track record: 35 → 23. Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered track record accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- 2026-07-03 Player reviews: 43 → 22. Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered player reviews accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- 2026-07-03 Redemption reliability: 50 → 29. Automated community-complaint mining (2026-07-03): public reviews show account_closure, kyc_problem (neg_ratio 1.0, 22 reviews). Lowered redemption/cashout accordingly. Run: local-full-refresh-reddit-pass-2026-07-02 (requested by Noah). Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/gambling/comments/1uifqyf/scrooge_casino_warning/, https://www.reddit.com/r/SweepstakeSharks/comments/1uifkzr/scrooge_casino/
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 60 → 70. Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 25 → 35. Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 35 → 25. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. Track-record factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 70 → 60. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. KYC factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 50 → 35. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric — applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-15 Terms honesty: → 45. AI-drafted via DeepSeek (wayback ToS recovery), explicitly approved by Noah.
- 2026-06-15 Playthrough: → 40. AI-drafted via DeepSeek (wayback ToS recovery), explicitly approved by Noah.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like Scrooge
The closest alternatives to Scrooge on the same seven-factor Trust Score. Each is within 15 points of Scrooge's 39/100 and rated at least as trustworthy. Tap any to read its full review.
Sites like Scrooge: common questions
What are sites like Scrooge?
The closest by Trust Score are RadPoker, TrillerSweeps, Spinszy, each within 15 points of Scrooge's 39/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like Scrooge" page.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your experience
Anonymous, no account needed. Reports are reviewed before they go public. Accurate, first-hand accounts help everyone.
