BONUSBANDIT
← All trust scores

OPERATOR REVIEW · Solar Bloom LLC

Moonspin

18+ minimum age per Moonspin's terms 19+ where state law is higher (AL) state floors and our 21+ readership

The short answer

Moonspin

Not worth it for most players: the score carries a 8 point complaint penalty.

Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.

Score last verified July 31, 2026 Operator terms read June 14, 2026 Score published July 31, 2026 Data refreshed July 31, 2026 32 days since refresh How freshness works
Where you can play
26 states
Pick your state to see the answer for you.
How solid our proof is
Medium
Useful but incomplete evidence
Where our review stands
Monitored
Public-source evidence and automated watchers only.

The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.

4 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved. 1 more carries an automated draft that no editor has signed off yet.

What could go wrong

  • Avoid tier

    Moonspin scores 49 out of 100, inside our avoid band.

    Our score log Checked 2026-07-31 Published Trust Score 49 out of 100.

  • Complaint penalty applied

    The Trust Score carries a 8 point complaint penalty.

    Public reviews Checked 2026-07-03

What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not

  • Operator terms reviewed June 14, 2026 Operator terms
  • Owner on record Solar Bloom LLC Ownership record

This operator's evidence fingerprint

A compact read of the records that make this review different. Unknown means the evidence is not recorded here, not that the operator failed the test.

Terms and availability
Unknown: not recorded; 26 accepted states
Evidence coverage
5 of 7 factor inputs have verified evidence coverage; 2 evidence gaps remain
Public record
Unknown: no recorded event count; 10 score-history entries

Reader decision: Use the factor inputs with verified evidence coverage for Moonspin as the starting point. A delivered payout is unknown from the records shown here.

Where this review stands

No written verdict on Moonspin has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and Moonspin hasn't cleared that queue. The score below reflects an individual re-verification, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track Moonspin's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.

Score breakdown

Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.

4 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved. 1 more carries an automated draft that no editor has signed off yet. Score last verified July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.

Moonspin: what we know so far

Moonspin's strongest signal is Playthrough at 83/100. The biggest concern is Redemption reliability at 30/100.

STRENGTHS

  • 83

    How burdensome are wagering requirements?

  • 80

    Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?

  • 76

    (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.3/5 over 933 reviews (38% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping.…

WATCHOUTS

  • 30

    Severe redemption problems: players report multi-week to months-long waits, accounts banned with payouts pending, and winnings not honored…

  • 40

    Track record downgraded: a 2026 spike of unpaid-redemption and account-ban reports, with players escalating to the FTC and state AGs (2026-06-23).

  • 45

    Trustpilot reviews indicate payment issues and delays, suggesting support is not resolving problems effectively. A Reddit user reports a $700…

Every scored factor behind this operator's Trust Score, one factor per row
FactorWhat it measuresScore
Redemption reliability Do payouts arrive, and on time? 30
KYC fairness Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? 80
Terms honesty Do the terms match what the marketing implies? 72
Playthrough How burdensome are wagering requirements? 83
Track record Years operating without scandals or exits 40
Player reviews Sustained sentiment across platforms 76
Support Response quality when something goes wrong 45

How this score is calculated

Base score
57
renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
Freshness decay
−0
current, no decay
Complaint penalty
−8
from documented legal events
Published score
49
Avoid

The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.

Why this score?

Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Moonspin in its band.

Redemption reliability 30

30/100, weak (below 50).

Evidence type: First-hand account. Researched and written by Noah Rafkin on June 23, 2026.

Severe redemption problems: players report multi-week to months-long waits, accounts banned with payouts pending, and winnings not honored (2026-06-23).

  • Some source dates are not recorded.
KYC fairness 80

Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.

Terms honesty 72

72/100, strong (70–100).

Rubric band (methodology)

The Terms honesty factor (0-100): Scoring framework for terms transparency:
- 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible
- 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps
- 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading
- 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins
- 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses (refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, indefinite KYC freezes)

Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 14, 2026.

The ToS uses clear language and prominently states "NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT IS NECESSARY" and that the service is not real-money gambling. Redemption rules are referenced to separate Sweepstakes Rules. However, it includes a mandatory arbitration and class-action waiver (Section 17) with a 30-day opt-out, which is a standard but notable restriction on dispute resolution. The text is not misleading and avoids hidden traps, but the arbitration clause prevents a higher score.

NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCE OF WINNING. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. SEE THE RESPECTIVE MOONSPIN SWEEP RULES FOR FULL DETAILS.
  • Some source dates are not recorded.

Source: moonspin.us/documents/terms-and-conditions ↗

Playthrough 83

Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.

Track record 40

40/100, weak (below 50).

Evidence type: First-hand account. Researched and written by Noah Rafkin on June 23, 2026.

Track record downgraded: a 2026 spike of unpaid-redemption and account-ban reports, with players escalating to the FTC and state AGs (2026-06-23).

  • Some source dates are not recorded.

Complaint adjustment: Complaint penalty recomputed: active legal events (each easing 1 point per 90 days) plus any standing editorial complaint penalty.

Player reviews 76

76/100, strong (70–100).

Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.

(2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.3/5 over 933 reviews (38% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/moonspin.us

  • Some source dates are not recorded.
Support 45

45/100, weak (below 50).

Evidence type: Public reviews. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.

Trustpilot reviews indicate payment issues and delays, suggesting support is not resolving problems effectively. A Reddit user reports a $700 redemption held for 25 days, implying slow or unhelpful support. However, some sources mention 24/7 chat support, so response is not completely absent.

  • Some source dates are not recorded.

Terms and offer facts

Minimum redemption
$100 catalog median $100
States accepted
26

Read off Moonspin's own terms, June 14, 2026. Moonspin Terms of Service ↗

Where Moonspin accepts players

AK · AL · AR · CO · DC · HI · IA · KS · KY · MA · MN · MO · MS · NC · NH · NM · OH · OR · RI · SC · SD · TX · VA · VT · WI · WY

Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.

Bonus & features

We haven’t researched this yet.

We haven’t logged Moonspin’s current daily bonus, purchase bundles, or feature set yet. We won’t guess. Bonus values change constantly, so we only publish them with the date and source page we read them from. Know the current offers? Send a tip →

What's the daily bonus really worth?

We haven't measured Moonspin's daily bonus yet. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus after logging the real coins first-hand, day after day, never from marketing copy.

Played here? Tell us what its daily bonus pays and we'll test it ourselves. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.

Free entry (AMOE)

We don't earn affiliate revenue if you use this documented no-purchase route.

Moonspin's published terms include a no-purchase alternative method of entry. Here's the route we've recorded.

Method
Mail-in postcard
Per free entry
~$1.00 value per free entry
Mail to
MoonSpin.US PO Box 8213 Manchester NH 03108
Notes
4" x 6", unfolded, blank and unlined, placed inside a stamped #10 envelope addressed in handwriting; handwrite return address on front and 'Sweeps Entries'; handwrite on one side: unique single-use Postal Request Code, date generated, email, username, User ID, and statement; one request per envelope; first-class mail; no metered postage; must be posted from same state as verified residence.

Verified 2026-06-23. Source ↗ All free-entry routes →

Ownership

Operating entity on record: Solar Bloom LLC. That is what the corporate record and the operator's own terms show, which is not the same as knowing who runs the brand day to day.

Score history

Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:

50 70 2026-06-10: Baseline published, Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site. 2026-06-14: Terms honesty null→72 (+72), explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS uses clear language and prominently states "NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT IS NECESSARY" and that the service is not real-money gambling. Redemption rules are referenced to separate Sweepstakes Rules. However, it includes a mandatory arbitration and class-action waiver (Section 17) with a 30-day opt 2026-06-23: Redemption reliability 63→30 (-33), Severe redemption problems: players report multi-week to months-long waits, accounts banned with payouts pending, and winnings not honored (2026-06-23). 2026-06-23: Track record 75→40 (-35), Track record downgraded: a 2026 spike of unpaid-redemption and account-ban reports, with players escalating to the FTC and state AGs (2026-06-23). 2026-06-23: Player reviews 71→45 (-26), Public sentiment is poor: Trustpilot sits at 3.3 stars over 900+ reviews, with recent 1-star reviews dominated by redemption-delay and non-payment complaints (2026-06-23). 2026-06-23: Complaint penalty 0→-8 (-8), Editorial complaint-spike penalty: an active 2026 cluster of unpaid / weeks-late Moonspin redemptions and post-win account bans (Noah's report + verified Reddit & Trustpilot complaints, 2026-06-23). 2026-07-03: Player reviews 45→76 (+31), (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.3/5 over 933 reviews (38% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/moonspin.us 2026-07-03: Complaint penalty -8→0 (+8), Complaint penalty recomputed from active legal events (lawsuits and regulatory actions); each penalty eases by 1 point per 90 days. 2026-07-03: Complaint penalty 0→-8 (-8), Complaint penalty recomputed: active legal events (each easing 1 point per 90 days) plus any standing editorial complaint penalty. 2026-07-31: Support 50→45 (-5) 2026-09-02: Published score 49 (today, UTC) 2026-06-10 today
Every change is logged. How the history works.
  1. 2026-07-31 Support: 50 → 45.
  2. 2026-07-03 Complaint penalty: 0 → -8. Complaint penalty recomputed: active legal events (each easing 1 point per 90 days) plus any standing editorial complaint penalty.
  3. 2026-07-03 Complaint penalty: -8 → 0. Complaint penalty recomputed from active legal events (lawsuits and regulatory actions); each penalty eases by 1 point per 90 days.
Show the full history (7 earlier changes)
  1. 2026-07-03 Player reviews: 45 → 76. (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.3/5 over 933 reviews (38% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/moonspin.us
  2. 2026-06-23 Complaint penalty: 0 → -8. Editorial complaint-spike penalty: an active 2026 cluster of unpaid / weeks-late Moonspin redemptions and post-win account bans (Noah's report + verified Reddit & Trustpilot complaints, 2026-06-23).
  3. 2026-06-23 Player reviews: 71 → 45. Public sentiment is poor: Trustpilot sits at 3.3 stars over 900+ reviews, with recent 1-star reviews dominated by redemption-delay and non-payment complaints (2026-06-23).
  4. 2026-06-23 Track record: 75 → 40. Track record downgraded: a 2026 spike of unpaid-redemption and account-ban reports, with players escalating to the FTC and state AGs (2026-06-23).
  5. 2026-06-23 Redemption reliability: 63 → 30. Severe redemption problems: players report multi-week to months-long waits, accounts banned with payouts pending, and winnings not honored (2026-06-23).
  6. 2026-06-14 Terms honesty: → 72. explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS uses clear language and prominently states "NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT IS NECESSARY" and that the service is not real-money gambling. Redemption rules are referenced to separate Sweepstakes Rules. However, it includes a mandatory arbitration and class-action waiver (Section 17) with a 30-day opt
  7. 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.

Sites like Moonspin

Each one beats Moonspin on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.

  • Acebet

    We have watched more payouts land

    We have watched 1 payout land from Acebet, against none from Moonspin.

  • CasinoClick

    Better score for paying out

    CasinoClick scores 73 out of 100 for paying out, against 30 for Moonspin.

  • BabaCasino

    Better score for paying out

    BabaCasino scores 60 out of 100 for paying out, against 30 for Moonspin.

Sites like Moonspin: common questions

What are sites like Moonspin?

The closest by Trust Score are Acebet, LuckyBunny, CasinoClick, each within 15 points of Moonspin's 49/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like Moonspin" page.

Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated

Report your Moonspin experience

Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.

  1. You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
  2. A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
  3. If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for Moonspin. Some reports get logged and never published.

No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.

What's your report about?

Reporting on Moonspin.

Weekly sweeps intel

New operator launches, state-law changes, and operator-side ToS edits: vetted, not regurgitated.