OPERATOR REVIEW · Independent
Sweeper
18+ minimum age per Sweeper's terms 19+ where state law is higher (NE)
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
Is Sweeper legit? The short version
Sweeper's strongest signal is KYC fairness at 70/100. The biggest concern is Terms honesty at 35/100.
STRENGTHS
- KYC fairness 70
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land…
- Redemption reliability 60
Do payouts arrive, and on time?
- Playthrough 60
The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is…
WATCHOUTS
- Terms honesty 35
The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits…
We reserve the right to revise or amend these Terms as necessary... You hereby acknowledge that you will be legally bound by any modifications made, irrespective of your receipt or review of such notifications." / "A non-refundable fee of five U.S. dollars (USD $5.00) will be applied to each financial transaction processed into or out of a user’s account." / "We retain the authority to terminate your Customer Account should it remain inactive for a duration of sixty days or more.
- Support 50
Response quality when something goes wrong
- Track record 52
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land…
Where this review stands
No written verdict on Sweeper has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and Sweeper hasn't cleared that queue. The score below is the June 2026 baseline, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track Sweeper's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
Score from our automated rubric. Full editorial review pending. What this means.
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 60 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 70 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 35 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 60 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 52 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 57 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 55
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 55
- → Caution
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
Terms we reviewed: Sweeper Terms of Service ↗
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Sweeper in its band.
Redemption reliability 60
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for Sweeper yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
KYC fairness 70
70/100, strong (70–100).
Logged change
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
Terms honesty 35
35/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
f_tos_honesty (0-100) — Scoring framework for terms transparency: - 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible - 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps - 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading - 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins - 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses (refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, indefinite KYC freezes)
AI-drafted from ToS (DeepSeek), approved by Noah Jun 14, 2026
The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits account termination for 60 days of inactivity without notice (2.8), imposes a mandatory $5 fee on all transactions (3.2.1), and grants the operator sole discretion to void promotions and suspend accounts for suspected abuse without prior notice (3.2.1). These buried caveats and unilateral powers push the score into the 30-49 range per the rubric.
We reserve the right to revise or amend these Terms as necessary... You hereby acknowledge that you will be legally bound by any modifications made, irrespective of your receipt or review of such notifications." / "A non-refundable fee of five U.S. dollars (USD $5.00) will be applied to each financial transaction processed into or out of a user’s account." / "We retain the authority to terminate your Customer Account should it remain inactive for a duration of sixty days or more.
Playthrough 60
60/100, mixed (50–69).
Rubric band (methodology)
f_playthrough (0-100) — Scoring framework for wagering requirements: - 90-100: no playthrough OR <=1x on Sweeps Coins purchased entries - 70-89: 1-3x WR on SC - 50-69: 3-5x WR on SC - 30-49: 5-10x WR on SC OR confusing GC/SC mixing - 0-29: >=10x WR on SC OR "lifetime" wagering caps OR unrecoverable bonus locks
AI-drafted from ToS (DeepSeek), approved by Noah Jun 14, 2026
The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is conservatively placed at the midpoint of the 50-69 range (3-5x WR on SC) to reflect the absence of favorable or unfavorable terms.
Track record 52
52/100, mixed (50–69).
Logged change
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
Player reviews 57
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for Sweeper yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
Support 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for Sweeper yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
Where Sweeper accepts players
AK · AR · CO · DC · IA · KS · MA · MO · NC · NE · NH · NM · OR · RI · SD · TX · VA · WI · WY
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Risk timeline
-
Track record: 67 → 52 (-15) — Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric — applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Bonus & features
Site features as observed Jun 15, 2026 · source (sweepercasino.com) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
Site features
- Support
- Email 24/7
- Banking
- card
What's the daily bonus really worth?
We haven't measured Sweeper's daily bonus yet. No first-hand daily-bonus log and nothing sourced from its promotions page. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus once we've recorded the real coins, never from marketing.
Played here? Report what its daily bonus pays and it'll feed this estimate. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.
First-hand tests
Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.
Not yet tested by Noah
Sweeper is in the testing queue: a real account, a real deposit, and a real redemption, documented start to finish. Until then, the score above leans on player reports and primary-source terms.
What's a purchase really worth?
We haven't bought a coin package at Sweeper and logged it yet, so there's no first-hand purchase data to model real coin value from. We only calculate value from packages we've actually paid for and recorded. Never from the operator's marketing.
What the score already tells you: payouts return about 60% of theoretical value · play-through burden is 4.0×. See the methodology.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 60 → 70. Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 42 → 52. Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 52 → 42. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. Track-record factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 70 → 60. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. KYC factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 67 → 52. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric — applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-14 Terms honesty: → 35. AI-drafted via DeepSeek (batch ai-factor-fill-2026-06-14), explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits account termination for 60 days of inactivity without notice (2.8), imposes a mandatory $5 fee on all transactions (3.2.1), and grants the operator so
- 2026-06-14 Playthrough: → 60. AI-drafted via DeepSeek (batch ai-factor-fill-2026-06-14), explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is conservatively placed at the midpoint of the 50-69 range (3-5x WR on SC) to reflect the absence of favorable or unfavorable terms.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like Sweeper
The closest alternatives to Sweeper on the same seven-factor Trust Score. Each is within 15 points of Sweeper's 55/100 and rated at least as trustworthy. Tap any to read its full review.
Sites like Sweeper: common questions
What are sites like Sweeper?
The closest by Trust Score are MetaWin, Pulsz, Zula, each within 15 points of Sweeper's 55/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like Sweeper" page.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your experience
Anonymous, no account needed. Reports are reviewed before they go public. Accurate, first-hand accounts help everyone.
