OPERATOR REVIEW · Independent
Sweeper
18+ minimum age per Sweeper's terms 19+ where state law is higher (NE) state floors and our 21+ readership
The short answer
Sweeper
Sweeper’s listed homepage and terms could not be retrieved in our September check.
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
Compare safer alternatives ↓Visit PlayFame instead →
We may earn a commission if you sign up or purchase through this link. It does not affect the score. Disclosure
Latest evidence or editorial update: .
- Where you can play
- 19 states
- Pick your state to see the answer for you.
- How solid our proof is
- Medium
- Useful but incomplete evidence
- Where our review stands
- Reviewed
- Written verdict published. 3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence an editor approved.
The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah.
What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not
- Operator terms reviewed June 14, 2026 Operator terms
The verdict
Sweeper’s listed homepage and terms could not be retrieved in our September check. Independent review sites report closure, but we have no operator notice confirming a final redemption deadline or account-balance outcome.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. Editorial review completed July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.
Is Sweeper legit? The short version
Sweeper’s listed homepage and terms could not be retrieved in our September check. Its highest-scoring factor is KYC fairness (70/100); its lowest is Terms honesty (35/100).
HIGHER FACTOR SCORES
- KYC fairness 70
Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?
- Redemption reliability 60
Current first-hand record: No first-hand redemption records are available.
- Playthrough 60
The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is…
LOWER FACTOR SCORES
- Terms honesty 35
The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits…
We reserve the right to revise or amend these Terms as necessary... You hereby acknowledge that you will be legally bound by any modifications made, irrespective of your receipt or review of such notifications." / "A non-refundable fee of five U.S. dollars (USD $5.00) will be applied to each financial transaction processed into or out of a user’s account." / "We retain the authority to terminate your Customer Account should it remain inactive for a duration of sixty days or more.
- Player reviews 50
Only third-party review sites show ratings (2.4/5, 3.1/5, 3.3/5, 3.5/5) but no actual user reviews are provided. Trustpilot pages exist but contain…
- Support 50
Response quality when something goes wrong
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 60 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 70 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 35 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 60 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 52 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 50 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 55
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 55
- → Caution
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. Methodology v1: applicable rules.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Sweeper in its band.
Terms honesty 35
35/100, weak (below 50).
Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 14, 2026.
The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits account termination for 60 days of inactivity without notice (2.8), imposes a mandatory $5 fee on all transactions (3.2.1), and grants the operator sole discretion to void promotions and suspend accounts for suspected abuse without prior notice (3.2.1). These buried caveats and unilateral powers push the score into the 30-49 range per the rubric.
We reserve the right to revise or amend these Terms as necessary... You hereby acknowledge that you will be legally bound by any modifications made, irrespective of your receipt or review of such notifications." / "A non-refundable fee of five U.S. dollars (USD $5.00) will be applied to each financial transaction processed into or out of a user’s account." / "We retain the authority to terminate your Customer Account should it remain inactive for a duration of sixty days or more.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Playthrough 60
60/100, mixed (50–69).
Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 14, 2026.
The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is conservatively placed at the midpoint of the 50-69 range (3-5x WR on SC) to reflect the absence of favorable or unfavorable terms.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Player reviews 50
50/100, mixed (50–69).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.
Only third-party review sites show ratings (2.4/5, 3.1/5, 3.3/5, 3.5/5) but no actual user reviews are provided. Trustpilot pages exist but contain no review text. Insufficient evidence to determine actual player sentiment.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Sweeper Casino: failed access and outside reports of a shutdown
Our September 8, 2026 check could not retrieve www.sweepercasino.com or either version of its listed terms address. The failed connections leave us without a current operator page confirming that registration, gameplay, or prize requests remain available.
Closure reports are corroborating evidence, with limits
Daily Cash List’s Sweeper review says the site appears to have shut down. SweepsKings’ closed-site directory also lists Sweeper as shut down without notice. Those are outside publishers’ assessments. We have not obtained an operator-issued closure announcement or a final account-service schedule.
Old bonus figures should not function as live offers
An indexed page or an older review can remain available after the underlying service stops responding. It cannot establish that a historical signup credit can still be claimed or that an advertised redemption minimum can still be used.
For an existing account, the unresolved questions are whether the operator still accepts prize requests, which contact channel remains staffed, and what happened to unredeemed balances. We have no first-hand payment or closure correspondence answering those questions. A similarly named replacement should not inherit Sweeper’s account history without a verified migration notice.
BonusBandit editorial · updated September 8, 2026. First-hand results come from our recorded tests. Operator rules and correspondence are separately attributed and dated in these notes.
Terms and offer facts
- States accepted
- 19
Read off Sweeper's own terms, June 14, 2026. Sweeper Terms of Service ↗
Where Sweeper accepts players
AK · AR · CO · DC · IA · KS · MA · MO · NC · NE · NH · NM · OR · RI · SD · TX · VA · WI · WY
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Bonus & features
Site features as observed Jun 15, 2026 · source (sweepercasino.com) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
Site features
- Support
- Email 24/7
- Banking
- card
Risk timeline
-
Track record: 67 → 52 (-15). Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-31 Player reviews: 57 → 50.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 52 → 42. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. Track-record factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 70 → 60. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. KYC factor lowered.
Show the full history (4 earlier changes)
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 67 → 52. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-14 Terms honesty: → 35. explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits account termination for 60 days of inactivity without notice (2.8), imposes a mandatory $5 fee on all transactions (3.2.1), and grants the operator so
- 2026-06-14 Playthrough: → 60. explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is conservatively placed at the midpoint of the 50-69 range (3-5x WR on SC) to reflect the absence of favorable or unfavorable terms.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like Sweeper
Each one beats Sweeper on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.
-
CoinsRoyale
69/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026We have watched more payouts land
We have watched 1 payout land from CoinsRoyale, against none from Sweeper.
-
Shuffle
69/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for paying out
Shuffle scores 73 out of 100 for paying out, against 60 for Sweeper.
-
ClubsPoker
67/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for honest terms
ClubsPoker scores 87 out of 100 for honest terms, against 35 for Sweeper.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your Sweeper experience
Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.
- You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
- A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
- If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for Sweeper. Some reports get logged and never published.
No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.