OPERATOR REVIEW · Independent
Sweeper
18+ minimum age per Sweeper's terms 19+ where state law is higher (NE) state floors and our 21+ readership
The short answer
Sweeper
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
View evidence or compare ↓Visit PlayFame instead →
Affiliate link. Never affects the score. Disclosure
- Where you can play
- 19 states
- Pick your state to see the answer for you.
- How solid our proof is
- Medium
- Useful but incomplete evidence
- Where our review stands
- Monitored
- Public-source evidence and automated watchers only.
The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved.
What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not
- Operator terms reviewed June 14, 2026 Operator terms
This operator's evidence fingerprint
A compact read of the records that make this review different. Unknown means the evidence is not recorded here, not that the operator failed the test.
- Terms and availability
- Unknown: not recorded; 19 accepted states
- Evidence coverage
- 3 of 7 factor inputs have verified evidence coverage; 4 evidence gaps remain
- Public record
- Unknown: no recorded event count; 7 score-history entries
Reader decision: Use the factor inputs with verified evidence coverage for Sweeper as the starting point. A delivered payout is unknown from the records shown here.
Where this review stands
No written verdict on Sweeper has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and Sweeper hasn't cleared that queue. The score below reflects an individual re-verification, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track Sweeper's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
3 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved. Score last verified July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.
Sweeper: what we know so far
Sweeper's strongest signal is KYC fairness at 70/100. The biggest concern is Terms honesty at 35/100.
STRENGTHS
- KYC fairness 70
Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?
- Redemption reliability 60
Do payouts arrive, and on time?
- Playthrough 60
The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is…
WATCHOUTS
- Terms honesty 35
The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits…
We reserve the right to revise or amend these Terms as necessary... You hereby acknowledge that you will be legally bound by any modifications made, irrespective of your receipt or review of such notifications." / "A non-refundable fee of five U.S. dollars (USD $5.00) will be applied to each financial transaction processed into or out of a user’s account." / "We retain the authority to terminate your Customer Account should it remain inactive for a duration of sixty days or more.
- Player reviews 50
Only third-party review sites show ratings (2.4/5, 3.1/5, 3.3/5, 3.5/5) but no actual user reviews are provided. Trustpilot pages exist but contain…
- Support 50
Response quality when something goes wrong
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 60 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 70 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 35 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 60 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 52 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 50 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 55
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 55
- → Caution
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Sweeper in its band.
Redemption reliability 60
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
KYC fairness 70
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Terms honesty 35
35/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
The Terms honesty factor (0-100): Scoring framework for terms transparency: - 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible - 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps - 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading - 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins - 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses (refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, indefinite KYC freezes)
Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 14, 2026.
The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits account termination for 60 days of inactivity without notice (2.8), imposes a mandatory $5 fee on all transactions (3.2.1), and grants the operator sole discretion to void promotions and suspend accounts for suspected abuse without prior notice (3.2.1). These buried caveats and unilateral powers push the score into the 30-49 range per the rubric.
We reserve the right to revise or amend these Terms as necessary... You hereby acknowledge that you will be legally bound by any modifications made, irrespective of your receipt or review of such notifications." / "A non-refundable fee of five U.S. dollars (USD $5.00) will be applied to each financial transaction processed into or out of a user’s account." / "We retain the authority to terminate your Customer Account should it remain inactive for a duration of sixty days or more.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Playthrough 60
60/100, mixed (50–69).
Rubric band (methodology)
The Playthrough factor (0-100): Scoring framework for wagering requirements: - 90-100: no playthrough OR <=1x on Sweeps Coins purchased entries - 70-89: 1-3x WR on SC - 50-69: 3-5x WR on SC - 30-49: 5-10x WR on SC OR confusing GC/SC mixing - 0-29: >=10x WR on SC OR "lifetime" wagering caps OR unrecoverable bonus locks
Evidence type: Operator terms. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on June 14, 2026.
The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is conservatively placed at the midpoint of the 50-69 range (3-5x WR on SC) to reflect the absence of favorable or unfavorable terms.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Track record 52
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Player reviews 50
50/100, mixed (50–69).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.
Only third-party review sites show ratings (2.4/5, 3.1/5, 3.3/5, 3.5/5) but no actual user reviews are provided. Trustpilot pages exist but contain no review text. Insufficient evidence to determine actual player sentiment.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Support 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Terms and offer facts
- States accepted
- 19
Read off Sweeper's own terms, June 14, 2026. Sweeper Terms of Service ↗
Where Sweeper accepts players
AK · AR · CO · DC · IA · KS · MA · MO · NC · NE · NH · NM · OR · RI · SD · TX · VA · WI · WY
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Bonus & features
Site features as observed Jun 15, 2026 · source (sweepercasino.com) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
Site features
- Support
- Email 24/7
- Banking
- card
What's the daily bonus really worth?
We haven't measured Sweeper's daily bonus yet. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus after logging the real coins first-hand, day after day, never from marketing copy.
Played here? Tell us what its daily bonus pays and we'll test it ourselves. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.
Risk timeline
-
Track record: 67 → 52 (-15). Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-31 Player reviews: 57 → 50.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 52 → 42. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. Track-record factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 70 → 60. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. KYC factor lowered.
Show the full history (4 earlier changes)
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 67 → 52. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-14 Terms honesty: → 35. explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS contains several player-hostile clauses that lower transparency: it allows modification of terms without requiring user review (1.1), permits account termination for 60 days of inactivity without notice (2.8), imposes a mandatory $5 fee on all transactions (3.2.1), and grants the operator so
- 2026-06-14 Playthrough: → 60. explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS does not specify any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins winnings. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score is conservatively placed at the midpoint of the 50-69 range (3-5x WR on SC) to reflect the absence of favorable or unfavorable terms.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like Sweeper
Each one beats Sweeper on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.
-
CoinsRoyale
69/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026We have watched more payouts land
We have watched 1 payout land from CoinsRoyale, against none from Sweeper.
-
Shuffle
69/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for paying out
Shuffle scores 73 out of 100 for paying out, against 60 for Sweeper.
-
ClubsPoker
67/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for honest terms
ClubsPoker scores 87 out of 100 for honest terms, against 35 for Sweeper.
Sites like Sweeper: common questions
What are sites like Sweeper?
The closest by Trust Score are Shuffle, Smiles, CoinsRoyale, each within 15 points of Sweeper's 55/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like Sweeper" page.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your Sweeper experience
Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.
- You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
- A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
- If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for Sweeper. Some reports get logged and never published.
No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.