OPERATOR REVIEW · Big Run Studios Inc.
SweepsNight
18+ minimum age per SweepsNight's terms 19+ where state law is higher (NE)
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
Is SweepsNight legit? The short version
SweepsNight's strongest signal is KYC fairness at 70/100. The biggest concern is Playthrough at 50/100.
STRENGTHS
- KYC fairness 70
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land…
- Terms honesty 65
The ToS includes a mandatory arbitration and class-action waiver prominently disclosed in the opening notice, which is a clear limitation on dispute…
THESE TERMS OF USE INCLUDE AN ARBITRATION AND CLASS ACTION WAIVER AGREEMENT WHICH REQUIRES THAT ANY PAST, PENDING, OR FUTURE DISPUTES BETWEEN YOU AND US SHALL BE RESOLVED BY FINAL AND BINDING ARBITRATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS ONLY
- Redemption reliability 60
Do payouts arrive, and on time?
WATCHOUTS
- Playthrough 50
The Terms of Service do not mention any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins or any virtual currency. Since the text is silent on…
- Support 50
Response quality when something goes wrong
- Track record 52
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land…
Where this review stands
No written verdict on SweepsNight has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and SweepsNight hasn't cleared that queue. The score below is the June 2026 baseline, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track SweepsNight's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
Score from our automated rubric. Full editorial review pending. What this means.
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 60 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 70 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 65 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 50 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 52 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 57 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 59
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 59
- → Caution
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
Terms we reviewed: SweepsNight Terms of Service ↗
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed SweepsNight in its band.
Redemption reliability 60
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for SweepsNight yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
KYC fairness 70
70/100, strong (70–100).
Logged change
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
Terms honesty 65
65/100, mixed (50–69).
Rubric band (methodology)
f_tos_honesty (0-100) — Scoring framework for terms transparency: - 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible - 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps - 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading - 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins - 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses (refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, indefinite KYC freezes)
AI-drafted from ToS (DeepSeek), approved by Noah Jun 14, 2026
The ToS includes a mandatory arbitration and class-action waiver prominently disclosed in the opening notice, which is a clear limitation on dispute resolution. Redemption rules are not stated up-front, and the text is standard sweeps boilerplate that requires careful reading to understand the license and coin expiration terms. The language is generally clear but contains buried caveats (e.g., Virtual Coins expiration, absolute right to modify/eliminate coins) that reduce transparency.
THESE TERMS OF USE INCLUDE AN ARBITRATION AND CLASS ACTION WAIVER AGREEMENT WHICH REQUIRES THAT ANY PAST, PENDING, OR FUTURE DISPUTES BETWEEN YOU AND US SHALL BE RESOLVED BY FINAL AND BINDING ARBITRATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS ONLY
Playthrough 50
50/100, mixed (50–69).
Rubric band (methodology)
f_playthrough (0-100) — Scoring framework for wagering requirements: - 90-100: no playthrough OR <=1x on Sweeps Coins purchased entries - 70-89: 1-3x WR on SC - 50-69: 3-5x WR on SC - 30-49: 5-10x WR on SC OR confusing GC/SC mixing - 0-29: >=10x WR on SC OR "lifetime" wagering caps OR unrecoverable bonus locks
AI-drafted from ToS (DeepSeek), approved by Noah Jun 14, 2026
The Terms of Service do not mention any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins or any virtual currency. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score must be conservatively placed toward the boilerplate middle of the rubric, which corresponds to the 3-5x WR range.
Track record 52
52/100, mixed (50–69).
Logged change
Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
Player reviews 57
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for SweepsNight yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
Support 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. We haven't logged a per-factor review for SweepsNight yet. If you've tested with them, report your experience.
Where SweepsNight accepts players
AR · CO · DC · GA · HI · IA · KS · MA · MN · NC · ND · NE · NH · NM · OH · OR · RI · SC · SD · TX · VA · VT · WI · WY
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Risk timeline
-
Track record: 67 → 52 (-15) — Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric — applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
Bonus & features
Site features as observed Jun 15, 2026 · source (sweepsnight.com) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
What's the daily bonus really worth?
We haven't measured SweepsNight's daily bonus yet. No first-hand daily-bonus log and nothing sourced from its promotions page. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus once we've recorded the real coins, never from marketing.
Played here? Report what its daily bonus pays and it'll feed this estimate. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.
First-hand tests
Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.
Not yet tested by Noah
SweepsNight is in the testing queue: a real account, a real deposit, and a real redemption, documented start to finish. Until then, the score above leans on player reports and primary-source terms.
Free entry (AMOE)
We don't earn affiliate revenue if you go this route, but it's legal and free.
SweepsNight accepts a no-purchase entry, the alternative method of entry every legitimate sweepstakes must offer. Here's the route we've recorded.
- Method
- Mail-in postcard
- Per free entry
- ~$5.00 value per free entry
- Mail to
- Big Run Studios Attn: Sweeps Night Mail In 1999 Harrision St. Suite 1800 Oakland, CA 94612
- Notes
- Standard, white, one-sided, unfolded, unlined #10 envelope; include a standard, white, one-sided, unfolded, unlined 4x6 index card with full name, email, username, residential address, handwritten statement and signature; limit one per outer envelope; handwriting must be legible.
Verified 2026-06-23. Source ↗ All free-entry routes →
What's a purchase really worth?
We haven't bought a coin package at SweepsNight and logged it yet, so there's no first-hand purchase data to model real coin value from. We only calculate value from packages we've actually paid for and recorded. Never from the operator's marketing.
What the score already tells you: payouts return about 60% of theoretical value · play-through burden is 5.0×. See the methodology.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 60 → 70. Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 42 → 52. Reversed zero-signal penalty: the original deduction was too aggressive — over-penalized legitimately new or untested operators (VGW Lucky Land Slots, Betr Holdings, and other freshly-added catalog entries). Restoring prior value.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 52 → 42. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. Track-record factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 70 → 60. Zero-signal penalty: no verdict, no first-hand cashout, no first-hand test session of any kind. KYC factor lowered.
- 2026-06-19 Track record: 67 → 52. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric — applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
- 2026-06-14 Terms honesty: → 65. AI-drafted via DeepSeek (batch ai-factor-fill-2026-06-14), explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The ToS includes a mandatory arbitration and class-action waiver prominently disclosed in the opening notice, which is a clear limitation on dispute resolution. Redemption rules are not stated up-front, and the text is standard sweeps boilerplate that requires careful reading to understand the licen
- 2026-06-14 Playthrough: → 50. AI-drafted via DeepSeek (batch ai-factor-fill-2026-06-14), explicitly approved by Noah. Justification: The Terms of Service do not mention any playthrough or wagering requirements for Sweeps Coins or any virtual currency. Since the text is silent on this factor, the score must be conservatively placed toward the boilerplate middle of the rubric, which corresponds to the 3-5x WR range.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like SweepsNight
The closest alternatives to SweepsNight on the same seven-factor Trust Score. Each is within 15 points of SweepsNight's 59/100 and rated at least as trustworthy. Tap any to read its full review.
See all sites like SweepsNight →
Sites like SweepsNight: common questions
What are sites like SweepsNight?
The closest by Trust Score are MetaWin, Pulsz, Zula, each within 15 points of SweepsNight's 59/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like SweepsNight" page.
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your experience
Anonymous, no account needed. Reports are reviewed before they go public. Accurate, first-hand accounts help everyone.
