OPERATOR REVIEW · Mamba Limited
Zonko
18+ minimum age per Zonko's terms 19+ where state law is higher (AL, NE) state floors and our 21+ readership
The short answer
Zonko
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
View evidence or compare ↓Visit Zonko →
Affiliate link. Never affects the score. Disclosure
- Where you can play
- 39 states
- Pick your state to see the answer for you.
- How solid our proof is
- Low
- Preliminary evidence
- Where our review stands
- Monitored
- Public-source evidence and automated watchers only.
The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.
1 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved.
What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not
- Owner on record Mamba Limited Ownership record
Where this review stands
No written verdict on Zonko has been published yet. We only publish verdicts after working an operator's evidence by hand, and Zonko hasn't cleared that queue. The score below is the July 2026 baseline, computed from the same seven-factor formula as every operator on the site. Automated watchers track Zonko's terms and availability in the meantime, and any score movement lands in the changelog with its reason.
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
1 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.
Zonko: what we know so far
Zonko's strongest signal is Terms honesty at 60/100. The biggest concern is Track record at 50/100.
STRENGTHS
- Terms honesty 60
Scored 2026-07-07 from Zonko's first-party Terms of Use (zonko.com/help/terms, read 2026-07-07). The terms read as standard sweepstakes boilerplate:…
- Redemption reliability 50
Do payouts arrive, and on time?
- KYC fairness 50
Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?
WATCHOUTS
- Track record 50
Years operating without scandals or exits
- Player reviews 50
Sustained sentiment across platforms
- Support 50
Response quality when something goes wrong
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 50 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 50 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 60 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | not yet scored |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 50 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 50 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 52
- renormalized weighted average over 6 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 52
- → Caution
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
"Not yet scored" means we have not independently assessed this factor; under methodology v1 it currently contributes 0 to the weighted total. We are working through the catalog.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed Zonko in its band.
Redemption reliability 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
KYC fairness 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Terms honesty 60
60/100, mixed (50–69).
Scored 2026-07-07 from Zonko's first-party Terms of Use (zonko.com/help/terms, read 2026-07-07). The terms read as standard sweepstakes boilerplate: they state plainly that the service does not offer real-money gambling, name the operating entity, and set out verification and eligibility rules, but they bind players to individual arbitration with a class-action waiver and do not spell out redemption minimums in the terms themselves. Mid-band honesty.
- Review date
- July 7, 2026
- Reviewer state
- Human authored
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Playthrough not yet scored
This factor is not yet independently assessed for Zonko. See the methodology.
Track record 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Player reviews 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Support 50
Score derived from our public-record rubric. No logged review for this factor yet.
Terms and offer facts
- States accepted
- 39
Read off Zonko's own terms. Zonko Terms of Service ↗
Where Zonko accepts players
AK · AL · AR · AZ · CO · DC · FL · GA · HI · IA · IL · IN · KS · KY · MA · MD · ME · MN · MO · MS · NC · ND · NE · NH · NM · OH · OK · OR · PA · RI · SC · SD · TX · UT · VA · VT · WI · WV · WY
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Bonus & features
Site features as observed · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
Site features
- Support
What's the daily bonus really worth?
We haven't measured Zonko's daily bonus yet. We only put a cash figure on a daily bonus after logging the real coins first-hand, day after day, never from marketing copy.
Played here? Tell us what its daily bonus pays and we'll test it ourselves. Or see operators we have measured on the daily-bonus value leaderboard.
Risk timeline
No notable events recorded for Zonko. Clean track record.
Ownership
Operating entity on record: Mamba Limited. That is what the corporate record and the operator's own terms show, which is not the same as knowing who runs the brand day to day.
Related brands: Mamba Limited →
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-07 Terms honesty: → 60. Scored 2026-07-07 from Zonko's first-party Terms of Use (zonko.com/help/terms, read 2026-07-07). The terms read as standard sweepstakes boilerplate: they state plainly that the service does not offer real-money gambling, name the operating entity, and set out verification and eligibility rules, but they bind players to individual arbitration with a class-action waiver and do not spell out redemption minimums in the terms themselves. Mid-band honesty.
Sites like Zonko
Each one beats Zonko on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.
-
MegaSpinz
66/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026We have watched more payouts land
We have watched 1 payout land from MegaSpinz, against none from Zonko.
-
FortuneWins
66/100 CAUTION BASELINE JUL 16, 2026Better score for paying out
FortuneWins scores 67 out of 100 for paying out, against 50 for Zonko.
-
MetaWin
67/100 CAUTION VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for honest terms
MetaWin scores 72 out of 100 for honest terms, against 60 for Zonko.
Sites like Zonko: common questions
What are sites like Zonko?
The closest by Trust Score are Wandando, MetaWin, ClubsPoker, each within 15 points of Zonko's 52/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like Zonko" page.
Head-to-head
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your Zonko experience
Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.
- You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
- A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
- If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for Zonko. Some reports get logged and never published.
No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.