OPERATOR REVIEW · LuminaryPlay Operations Limited
MegaBonanza
21+ minimum age per MegaBonanza's terms state floors and our 21+ readership
The short answer
MegaBonanza
Workable for active players redeeming above the $75 minimum; avoid it if you play from a state it has left because MegaBonanza has pulled out of 2 states, most recently IN on 2026-06-14.
Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.
Visit MegaBonanza →Compare safer alternatives ↓
Affiliate link. Never affects the score. Disclosure
- Where you can play
- 33 states
- Pick your state to see the answer for you.
- What we cashed out
- 3 confirmed payouts totaling $327.84 (2 dated, 1 documented without a date, dollar total across both)
- How solid our proof is
- High
- Strong operator-specific evidence
The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.
See all the details
- Where our review stands
- Reviewed
- Written verdict published. 5 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence an editor approved.
- How long payouts took
- 1.0 days on 1 completed test
5 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. 2 more carry automated drafts that no editor has signed off yet.
What could go wrong
-
Exited 2 states
MegaBonanza has pulled out of 2 states, most recently IN on 2026-06-14.
Our state records Checked 2026-06-14 2 recorded state exits.
What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not
- Human-confirmed payouts 3 totaling $327.84 First-hand test
- Operator terms reviewed July 31, 2026 Operator terms
- Owner on record LuminaryPlay Operations Limited Ownership record
This operator's evidence fingerprint
A compact read of the records that make this review different. Unknown means the evidence is not recorded here, not that the operator failed the test.
- First-hand outcomes
- 3 delivered payouts, $327.84 recorded across all 3 payouts; 1 payout timing record
- Terms and availability
- 2 material terms changes recorded; 33 accepted states
- Evidence coverage
- 7 of 7 factor inputs have verified evidence coverage; 0 evidence gaps remain
- Public record
- Unknown: no recorded event count; 9 score-history entries
Reader decision: Start with the first-hand record for MegaBonanza: it documents 3 delivered payouts, $327.84 recorded across all 3 payouts. Check the timing and terms before deciding.
The verdict
The account can be restricted or terminated whenever verification cannot be completed for any reason, with no stated deadline for documents (Terms s8).
MegaBonanza’s payout case is one of the best-evidenced we hold: its redemption reliability factor is the highest-scoring factor on this page, and we have logged first-hand cashouts of our own, three delivered so far totaling $327.84. We have not yet reviewed individual player complaints for this operator, so this verdict leans on those receipts, our score factors, and the published terms.
One of those cashouts was a $115 ACH that cleared in about a day, so the payout itself is well proven. Where the case softens is the paperwork: the terms exclude the usual sweeps-hostile states (New York, Washington, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, and others), and, since June 14, Indiana and Maine, and they allow the account to be restricted or terminated whenever verification “cannot be completed for any reason” (Terms s8), with no stated deadline for documents. Disputes go to individual arbitration unless you opt out within 30 days. Its Isle of Man operator shares a registered office with PlayFame’s and SpinBlitz’s.
Anyone choosing on payout certainty alone is well served here: the evidence is first-hand and recent. The reasons to hesitate are the thin published terms and a middling support read, not the payouts. MegaBonanza suits players who want this group of Isle of Man operators and its game lineup.
First-hand evidence
First-hand redemption tested Noah personally cashed out from MegaBonanza in 24 hours.One redemption we ran with MegaBonanza
- Amount
- $115
- Time to pay
- 24 hours
- Requested
- May 28, 2026
- Received
- May 29, 2026
- Method
- ACH
Delivered 2 more redemption records are in the full record below.
The complete first-hand record
First-hand tests
Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.
Most recent test Jun 26, 2026. First-hand result: 3 confirmed payouts totaling $327.84 (2 dated, 1 documented without a date, dollar total across both). Payout time 24 hours on 1 timed payout.
Reconciled payout record
Counts and amounts for the rows shown below
| Outcome | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Confirmed delivered | 3 | $327.84 |
| Timed delivered payouts subset, not an extra | 1 | $115 |
Timed delivered payouts are counted again inside the confirmed delivered row, so this column is not a running total. Only confirmed delivered payouts produce a payout figure anywhere on this page.
Confirmed delivered payouts
3 confirmed payouts totaling $327.84 (2 dated, 1 documented without a date, dollar total across both)
| Received | Amount | Method | Time to pay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivered, received date not recorded | $95.74 | Standard ACH | Not measured |
| May 29, 2026 | $115.00 | ACH | 24h |
| Apr 27, 2026 | $117.10 | Not recorded | Not measured |
Payout time: 24 hours on 1 timed payout. Measured only on delivered payouts that carry both a request and a received timestamp, so a payout we could not time is never averaged in.
Incomplete detail on 2 of 3: each gap is labelled on its row, and a figure we do not hold is left out of the totals rather than counted as zero.
Daily bonus: week at a glance
Week of Jun 14–Jun 20
| Sun14 | Mon15 | Tue16 | Wed17 | Thu18 | Fri19 | Sat20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| SC | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
Notes & evidence (2)
Cash-out proof
3 confirmed payouts totaling $327.84 (2 dated, 1 documented without a date, dollar total across both) 24 hours on 1 timed payout
- Payout received Delivered, received date not recorded$95.74
- Method
- Standard ACH
Payout time not measured
Identifiers redacted
- Payout received May 29, 2026$115.00
- Method
- ACH
- Time to pay
- 24h
Identifiers redacted
- Payout received Apr 27, 2026$117.10
Method not recorded · Payout time not measured
Identifiers redacted
Cash-out & verification: first-hand
Score breakdown
Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.
5 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. 2 more carry automated drafts that no editor has signed off yet. Editorial review completed July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.
Is MegaBonanza legit? The short version
One of our top-rated operators, and payouts are its strong suit: fast, proven first-hand cashouts. The watchouts are support and thin terms, not redemption. Its strongest factor is Playthrough (100/100); the biggest watchout is Terms honesty (25/100).
STRENGTHS
- Playthrough 100
The current official terms describe a Gold-Coin-style entertainment product rather than a redeemable sweepstakes-currency product. They state that…
- Redemption reliability 94
Noah's first-hand cashouts cleared fast: a $115 ACH redemption landed in 24 hours.
- KYC fairness 90
Noah's first-hand KYC cleared on the first cycle with no resubmission needed.
WATCHOUTS
- Terms honesty 25
The live terms are explicit rather than hidden, but the published rubric places explicit no-refund and broad forfeiture provisions in its lowest…
- Support 50
The observed public record fits the mixed 50-69 band: formal round-the-clock channels exist, but complaint handling commonly extends beyond the…
- Player reviews 82
Player reviews rebuilt from a live Trustpilot read: 4.2/5 across 5,892 reviews, with about 20 percent at 1-2 stars.
| Factor | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Redemption reliability | Do payouts arrive, and on time? | 94 |
| KYC fairness | Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? | 90 |
| Terms honesty | Do the terms match what the marketing implies? | 25 |
| Playthrough | How burdensome are wagering requirements? | 100 |
| Track record | Years operating without scandals or exits | 88 |
| Player reviews | Sustained sentiment across platforms | 82 |
| Support | Response quality when something goes wrong | 50 |
How this score is calculated
- Base score
- 77
- renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
- Freshness decay
- −0
- current, no decay
- Complaint penalty
- −0
- none
- Published score
- 77
- → Trusted
The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. How they work.
Why this score?
Open any factor to see the evidence that placed MegaBonanza in its band.
Redemption reliability 94
94/100, strong (70–100).
Evidence type: First-hand account. Researched and written by Noah Rafkin on June 19, 2026.
Noah's first-hand cashouts cleared fast: a $115 ACH redemption landed in 24 hours.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
KYC fairness 90
90/100, strong (70–100).
Evidence type: First-hand account. Researched and written by Noah Rafkin on June 19, 2026.
Noah's first-hand KYC cleared on the first cycle with no resubmission needed.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Terms honesty 25
25/100, weak (below 50).
Rubric band (methodology)
The Terms honesty factor (0-100) - 90-100: clear language, no hidden caps, redemption rules stated up-front, no class-action waiver, dispute resolution accessible; 70-89: mostly clear, some buried caveats but no traps; 50-69: standard sweeps boilerplate, redemption rules require careful reading; 30-49: misleading marketing vs ToS, hidden caps, complex playthrough lock-ins; 0-29: explicit player-hostile clauses such as refunds excluded, redemptions invalidatable at will, or indefinite KYC freezes.
Evidence type: Operator terms. Researched and written by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.
The live terms are explicit rather than hidden, but the published rubric places explicit no-refund and broad forfeiture provisions in its lowest band. Version 2.8 says purchases are final with no required refund, permits forfeiture when an account is suspended or terminated, permits unilateral coin management, and requires individual arbitration with a class-action waiver. The same document now describes ordinary Virtual Coins as carrying no cash value, so it does not publish redemption mechanics that could offset those risks with clear prize terms.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Playthrough 100
100/100, strong (70–100).
Rubric band (methodology)
The Playthrough factor (0-100) - 90-100: no playthrough or <=1x on Sweeps Coins purchased entries; 70-89: 1-3x wagering requirement on SC; 50-69: 3-5x on SC; 30-49: 5-10x on SC or confusing GC/SC mixing; 0-29: >=10x on SC, lifetime wagering caps, or unrecoverable bonus locks.
The current official terms describe a Gold-Coin-style entertainment product rather than a redeemable sweepstakes-currency product. They state that Virtual Coins are non-transferable and have no cash value, and they publish no playthrough multiplier before redemption. Under the fixed rubric, an expressly documented no-playthrough model belongs in the 90-100 band. A score of 100 reflects the absence of any published wagering requirement, not a claim that a separate future promotional contest could never impose its own rules.
- Review date
- July 31, 2026
- Reviewer state
- Human authored
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Track record 88
88/100, strong (70–100).
Evidence type: First-hand account. Automated draft dated June 14, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.
Delivered first-hand redemptions verified in person strengthen the track record.
- Sample size
- 3 cashouts
- Some source dates are not recorded.
First-hand redemptions:
- $95.74 paid via Standard ACH , received date not recorded
- $115 paid in 24h via ACH
- $117.10 paid
Player reviews 82
82/100, strong (70–100).
Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.
Player reviews rebuilt from a live Trustpilot read: 4.2/5 across 5,892 reviews, with about 20 percent at 1-2 stars.
- Some source dates are not recorded.
Support 50
50/100, mixed (50–69).
The observed public record fits the mixed 50-69 band: formal round-the-clock channels exist, but complaint handling commonly extends beyond the advertised response window and resolution evidence is weak.
- Review date
- July 31, 2026
- Reviewer state
- Human authored
- Some source dates are not recorded.
BonusBandit's notes on MegaBonanza
What our own cashouts looked like
The short verdict above tells you MegaBonanza pays. This is the receipt behind that claim. Our logged first-hand record now holds three delivered redemptions totaling $327.84. The clearest of them: on 2026-05-28 BonusBandit’s testing requested a $115.00 redemption to a linked bank account and it landed via ACH on 2026-05-29, a 24-hour turnaround logged first-hand rather than scraped from a review aggregator. Alongside it are a $95.74 Standard ACH payout, marked received with its payout date not separately recorded, and the $117.10 cashout an earlier draft of this note treated as still pending: our records now show it requested on 2026-04-26 and delivered the next day, 2026-04-27, so we count it as paid. Those delivered cash-outs are the biggest reason MegaBonanza’s redemption factor is the strongest line on its card at 94.
KYC is the other half of why we trust the money pipe here. When BonusBandit’s testing ran identity verification on 2026-06-01, the first cycle cleared with no resubmission loop, fast enough that the KYC factor sits high at 90. For a redemption-heavy operator, a clean first-pass KYC matters as much as the payout speed, because most non-payment complaints in this category trace back to verification limbo, not to the bank transfer itself.
What MegaBonanza does differently
The lobby leans hard into volume. Today’s homepage groups its library into Popular, New Releases, Exclusives, Hold & Win, Megaways, and Cascading/Tumble slots, plus a Live Casino rail; the operator does not publish a single headline game count, so we won’t invent one. The welcome offer read, verbatim, “150% Extra Coins” on the hero banner when we fetched megabonanza.com on 2026-06-25, structured as a purchase-match on Gold Coins rather than a no-strings Sweeps Coins drop; on our 2026-07-17 recheck the logged-out homepage showed no welcome-offer text at all, just the game lobby, so we can’t confirm a current offer. BonusBandit’s testing also logged a steady daily Sweeps Coins trickle across a full week in mid-June, 0.35 SC each day, every day from 06-14 through 06-20 with no skipped days. That is a modest but reliable daily-login mechanic; it is not a mystery-wheel gimmick, and our records flag it as a flat fixed amount rather than a variable spin.
The weakest link is support, not the paperwork
Two lines keep the overall score off the top shelf, and it is worth being precise about which one leads. The soft spot is support, scored 50, the weakest factor on MegaBonanza’s card, reflecting thin and uneven help-desk responsiveness with no deadline published on document checks. Close behind it is ToS transparency at 53: the published Terms of Service set the floor at 21 years old (“over 21 years of age or the minimum legal age of majority whichever is higher,” Section 3.1 of the ToS), stricter than the 18+ most of its accepted states allow, and the terms are thin and boilerplate, not spelling out redemption methods or AMOE. Support and terms both sit in the mixed band; neither is a wide-margin outlier, but support is the lower of the two.
The state map and two recent exits
MegaBonanza accepts players across most of the country and explicitly excludes the usual sweeps-hostile set (New York, Washington, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Connecticut, Maryland, Idaho, Montana, West Virginia, and others). The development worth flagging: it pulled out of Indiana and Maine on 2026-06-14, both recorded as exits in our tracker; each entry points to the Prohibited Territories section of the operator’s own Terms of Service (fetched 2026-06-10), with the exit dated 2026-06-14. Those are not enforcement bans we can tie to a legal event (there are no legal_events on file for this operator), so we read the dual exit as a precautionary geo-restriction rather than a regulator action. If you’re in IN or ME, the doors closed mid-June; check our legal pages for where your state stands before depositing anywhere.
Parent company and the Isle of Man footnote
MegaBonanza runs under LuminaryPlay Operations Limited. Our database does not link it to a sister-site group, so we make no claim of shared wallets or shared accounts. The published verdict does note a shared Isle of Man registered office with PlayFame and SpinBlitz; we surface that as a corporate-address coincidence worth knowing, not as a confirmed operational sister relationship: the kind of distinction we explain on our methodology page.
One external signal, honestly sourced
The third-party reputation read is mixed, and we’re not going to launder it. The player-reviews factor was rebuilt on 2026-07-02 from a live Trustpilot aggregate of 4.2/5 over 5,892 reviews (solid volume) with roughly a 20% one-to-two-star share that keeps sentiment from being clean. That split is why the reviews factor lands at 82, strong but not top of the card. It is a live read now, not a last-logged figure behind a bot wall.
How MegaBonanza stacks up
MegaBonanza sits near the top of our board, behind only PlayFame and SpinBlitz. It clears WOW Vegas, Gainz, and Jackpota. Its edge is almost entirely earned on the money side (a timed 24-hour ACH cash-out and instant KYC), not on flash. Against Pulsz or caution-tier Stake, the contrast is sharper. MegaBonanza’s weak spots are the help desk and a thin ToS, not the core question of whether you get paid.
What we’re watching
Two things would move this number. Upward: a fresh first-hand cash-out in the next quarter and steadier support responsiveness would push the redemption and support factors toward their caps. Downward: any reversal of the IN/ME pattern into a wider state retreat, a slip in KYC turnaround on a repeat test, or a Trustpilot one-to-two-star share climbing past that 20% line would all pull the score back toward caution. For now, the score reflects an operator that has actually paid us, three times, with the asterisks named out loud. Noah
Verified against BonusBandit’s live database on 2026-07-28; first-hand tests and delivered redemptions as logged; external signals from the live megabonanza.com homepage and Terms of Service (both fetched 2026-06-25); player-reviews factor rebuilt 2026-07-02 from a live Trustpilot aggregate of 4.2/5 over 5,892 reviews.
BonusBandit editorial · updated August 30, 2026. Cashout times, amounts, and availability trace to our live database and first-hand testing.
Terms and offer facts
- Minimum redemption
- $75 catalog median $100
- States accepted
- 33 2 exited, listed below
Read off MegaBonanza's own terms, July 31, 2026. MegaBonanza Terms of Service ↗
Where MegaBonanza accepts players
AK · AR · AZ · CO · DC · FL · GA · HI · IA · IL · KS · MA · MN · MO · MS · NC · ND · NE · NH · NM · OH · OK · OR · PA · RI · SC · SD · TX · UT · VA · VT · WI · WY
Exited: IN (2026-06-14), ME (2026-06-14). See what state exits mean for your balance.
Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.
Terms-of-service changes
Material revisions to MegaBonanza's Terms of Service, detected by diffing archived snapshots from the Wayback Machine. Newest first.
-
California is added to the list of prohibited states, meaning players in California are no longer eligible to use the service.
Eligibility
-
Tennessee was added to the list of prohibited states, and a note was added that promotions may have additional eligibility requirements.
Eligibility
Terms & redemption rules: first-hand
Bonus & features
Site features as observed Jun 23, 2026 · source (megabonanza.com) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.
Site features
- Support
- EmailPhone 24/7
Bonuses & coin offers: first-hand
What's the daily bonus really worth?
A daily bonus is free play, but its real worth depends on how hard it is to clear and whether MegaBonanza actually pays out.
Observed daily reward 0.4 SC/day Measured Averaged in person over 7 logged observations (2026-06-14 → 2026-06-20). ~$121/year projected, at 1× playthrough, before payout risk
Risk to collect Reliable payouts on record
| Period | GC accumulated | SC accumulated | Potential cash value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | – | 2.5 | ~$2.33 |
| 30 days | – | 10.5 | ~$9.98 |
| 365 days (annualized) | – | 127.8 | ~$121 |
Annualized figures are a projection, not a promise. They assume you claim the bonus every day and MegaBonanza's bonus structure holds steady. Daily bonuses change often; values shown as of 2026-06-20.
How this is calculated
We start from 0.4 SC per day (the average across the logged days), multiply by the number of days, divide by the playthrough (1× unless we've actually measured otherwise), then take a small RTP haircut, and nothing else. That's the value MegaBonanza offers:
- playthrough 1× playthrough (the sweeps norm), then a 5% RTP haircut
- ToS signal MegaBonanza's ToS playthrough language rates 100 → clean 1× playthrough. Almost every sweeps site is 1× in practice, so this is a TRUST read; it doesn't move the cash figure.
Why isn't redemption in the formula? Because how reliably MegaBonanza actually pays out is a separate question from how much it puts on the table. Discounting the dollar figure by redemption made a slow-paying operator look like it offered a smaller bonus, which is backwards. So payout reliability is shown above as the risk-to-collect badge, never baked into the number. MegaBonanza's redemption factor is 94 → reliable payouts on record.
We assume 1 SC ≈ $1 at redemption and that you claim the bonus every day. Averaged in person over 7 logged observations (2026-06-14 → 2026-06-20). The annual figure assumes the bonus structure stays stable. Full formula on the methodology page.
Source: Averaged in person over 7 logged observations (2026-06-14 → 2026-06-20). See the full first-hand log. See more daily-bonus value comparisons →
What's a purchase really worth?
We do not yet have enough first-hand evidence to estimate purchase value, effective playthrough, or redemption success for this operator.
What we hold for MegaBonanza: 0 logged packages · 0 completed purchase-to-payout cycles · 3 delivered redemptions.
We model coin value only from packages we paid for ourselves, and only once there is a payout record showing the coins can be collected. Until we have bought and logged a coin package at MegaBonanza, there is nothing here to model from.
What the factor scores do say: our terms review scores this operator's playthrough language at 100/100, and redemption reliability scores 94/100. A playthrough score rates how squarely the terms commit to a wagering multiplier, not the wagering you would face. A redemption score rates whether payouts arrive and arrive on time, not a share of your money coming back. Neither one can stand in for the tests we have not run here. See the methodology.
Risk timeline
-
Playthrough: 83 → 100 (+17). Rubric reassessed
-
Terms honesty: 53 → 25 (-28). Rubric reassessed
-
Redemption reliability: 77 → 94 (+17). Noah's first-hand cashouts cleared fast: a $115 ACH redemption landed in 24 hours.
-
Exited IN: stopped accepting players in the state
-
Exited ME: stopped accepting players in the state
Ownership
Operating entity on record: LuminaryPlay Operations Limited. That is what the corporate record and the operator's own terms show, which is not the same as knowing who runs the brand day to day.
Score history
Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:
- 2026-07-31 Playthrough: 83 → 100.
- 2026-07-31 Support: 50 → 50.
- 2026-07-31 Terms honesty: 53 → 25.
Show the full history (6 earlier changes)
- 2026-07-03 Player reviews: 70 → 82. Player reviews rebuilt from a live Trustpilot read: 4.2/5 across 5,892 reviews, with about 20 percent at 1-2 stars.
- 2026-06-19 Player reviews: 71 → 70. Trustpilot 4-star across 5,664 reviews but a 20% 1-star share keeps sentiment mixed.
- 2026-06-19 KYC fairness: 80 → 90. Noah's first-hand KYC cleared on the first cycle with no resubmission needed.
- 2026-06-19 Redemption reliability: 77 → 94. Noah's first-hand cashouts cleared fast: a $115 ACH redemption landed in 24 hours.
- 2026-06-14 Track record: 83 → 88. Delivered first-hand redemptions verified in person strengthen the track record.
- 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.
Sites like MegaBonanza
Each one beats MegaBonanza on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.
-
CrownCoins
73/100 TRUSTED VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026We have watched more payouts land
We have watched 28 payouts land from CrownCoins, against 3 from MegaBonanza.
What it costs you Its Trust Score is 4 points lower than MegaBonanza's.
-
Gains
73/100 TRUSTED VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for honest terms
Gains scores 75 out of 100 for honest terms, against 25 for MegaBonanza.
What it costs you Its Trust Score is 4 points lower than MegaBonanza's.
-
WowVegas
76/100 TRUSTED VERIFIED JUL 31, 2026Better score for honest terms
WowVegas scores 53 out of 100 for honest terms, against 25 for MegaBonanza.
What it costs you Its Trust Score is 1 point lower than MegaBonanza's.
See the full ranking of sites like MegaBonanza, with evidence and tradeoffs.
Sites like MegaBonanza: common questions
What are sites like MegaBonanza?
The closest by Trust Score are PlayFame, SpinBlitz, WowVegas, each within 15 points of MegaBonanza's 77/100 on the same seven-factor formula. The full alternatives rundown, with the review-base and first-hand payout evidence for each, is on the dedicated "sites like MegaBonanza" page.
Head-to-head
Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated
Report your MegaBonanza experience
Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.
- You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
- A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
- If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for MegaBonanza. Some reports get logged and never published.
No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.