BONUSBANDIT
← All trust scores

OPERATOR REVIEW · Kinetix Ventures, Inc.

SweepJungle

21+ minimum age per SweepJungle's terms state floors and our 21+ readership

The short answer

SweepJungle

SweepJungle has cancelled requests in our record and a broad current promotion-abuse condition.

Showing the national rating. Choose a state to see how its sweepstakes law changes the score.

Compare safer alternatives ↓Visit PlayFame instead →

We may earn a commission if you sign up or purchase through this link. It does not affect the score. Disclosure

Availability varies by state. Check the legality tracker.

First-hand test completed June 19, 2026 Editorial review completed July 31, 2026 by Noah Operator terms read July 31, 2026 Score published July 31, 2026 Data refreshed July 31, 2026 47 days since refresh How freshness works

Latest evidence or editorial update: .

Where you can play
32 states
Pick your state to see the answer for you.
How solid our proof is
Medium
Useful but incomplete evidence
Where our review stands
Reviewed
Written verdict published. 5 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence an editor approved.

The Trust Score is computed from seven factors. Research status and evidence confidence describe our review, not the operator.

5 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. 1 more carries an automated draft that no editor has signed off yet.

What could go wrong

  • Exited IN

    SweepJungle stopped accepting players in IN on 2026-07-06.

    Our state records Checked 2026-07-06 1 recorded state exit.

What BonusBandit knows that other reviews do not

  • Operator terms reviewed July 31, 2026 Operator terms
  • Owner on record Kinetix Ventures, Inc. Ownership record

The verdict

We have no confirmed delivered SweepJungle payout. The recorded requests were cancelled, and the correspondence about the dated attempt asked for resubmission after an antifraud process. That does not establish fraud by the player or a later successful payment.

The current terms define Promotional Conversion Abuse beyond automation or duplicate accounts. They say a pattern can qualify even where individual actions appear to meet technical requirements. This materially qualifies a simple playthrough comparison; we have not established that the current clause caused the earlier cancellation.

The daily grid contains explicit zeroes and positive observations, not a fixed reward schedule. SweepJungle’s useful evidence is its specific unresolved request history and current conditions. Neither a score factor nor third-party sentiment should be presented as proof that our money arrived.

General information, not financial or legal advice. Rules and availability can change.

First-hand evidence

The complete first-hand record

First-hand tests

Each delivered redemption contributes +5 to this operator’s Track Record score, up to +20.

Most recent test Jun 19, 2026.

Reconciled payout record

Counts and amounts for the rows shown below

Reconciled payout summary for SweepJungle
Outcome Count Amount
Additional attempts or unmatched records 2 $103 across 1 of 2

We have not confirmed a delivered payout from SweepJungle, so no payout figure appears anywhere on this page. The records above are requests and incomplete entries, which are not payouts.

Additional attempts or unmatched records

2 records, none counted as a payout

Redemption records for SweepJungle that are not confirmed payouts
State Requested Amount requested Incomplete evidence
Cancelled or rejected, not paid Not recorded Not recorded Recorded as cancelled or rejected, so it is excluded from every payout total · Amount not recorded · Method not recorded
Cancelled or rejected, not paid Mar 17, 2026 $103.00 Recorded as cancelled or rejected, so it is excluded from every payout total · Method not recorded

These are records we hold, not payouts. A redemption we requested but never watched land is not proof that SweepJungle paid it, and a record we cannot read is not proof of anything, so nothing in this table feeds a total, a median, a payout time, or any payout wording on this page.

Daily bonus: week at a glance

Week of Jun 14–Jun 20

Daily bonus values, week of Jun 14–Jun 20
Sun14Mon15Tue16Wed17Thu18Fri19Sat20
GC ·······
SC 00.10.100.1500.2

Score breakdown

Scored with the published, versioned formula: methodology v1 (scoring version e9a89dbe). Affiliate status has zero input.

5 of 7 factor inputs carry evidence reviewed and approved by Noah. 1 more carries an automated draft that no editor has signed off yet. Editorial review completed July 31, 2026. The published score is recomputed by the seven-factor formula from those inputs, not set by hand. What this means.

Is SweepJungle legit? The short version

SweepJungle has cancelled requests in our record and a broad current promotion-abuse condition. Its highest-scoring factor is Playthrough (100/100); its lowest is Terms honesty (25/100).

HIGHER FACTOR SCORES

  • 100

    The official current terms describe Gold Coins as entertainment-only and non-redeemable and publish no playthrough multiplier. The fixed rubric…

  • 87

    (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.9/5 over 658 reviews (20% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping.…

  • 70

    Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall?

LOWER FACTOR SCORES

  • 25

    The official terms make Gold Coin purchases final and non-refundable, permit account termination and voided results at broad discretion, and require…

  • 60

    Current first-hand record: No confirmed delivered payout. Available records do not establish a completed delivery.

  • 68

    Current first-hand record: No confirmed delivered payout. Available records do not establish a completed delivery.

Every scored factor behind this operator's Trust Score, one factor per row
FactorWhat it measuresScore
Redemption reliability Do payouts arrive, and on time? 60
KYC fairness Is verification a process or a payout-avoidance wall? 70
Terms honesty Do the terms match what the marketing implies? 25
Playthrough How burdensome are wagering requirements? 100
Track record Years operating without scandals or exits 68
Player reviews Sustained sentiment across platforms 87
Support Response quality when something goes wrong 70

How this score is calculated

Base score
65
renormalized weighted average over 7 of 7 factors
Freshness decay
−0
current, no decay
Complaint penalty
−0
none
Published score
65
Caution

The adjustments are formulas, not discretion. Methodology v1: applicable rules.

Why this score?

Open any factor to see the evidence that placed SweepJungle in its band.

Redemption reliability 60

Current first-hand record: No confirmed delivered payout. Available records do not establish a completed delivery. See source details

60/100, mixed (50–69).

Scoring rationale recorded 2026-07-31 (historical)

First-hand log records a March 17, 2026 redemption request canceled by antifraud with no received_at timestamp; this is negative unresolved evidence, not a successful payout. Score retained pending review.

Review date
July 31, 2026
Reviewer state
Human authored
  • Some source dates are not recorded.
Terms honesty 25

25/100, weak (below 50).

Evidence type: Operator terms. Researched and written by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.

The official terms make Gold Coin purchases final and non-refundable, permit account termination and voided results at broad discretion, and require arbitration with a class-action waiver. Those clauses map to the rubric's lowest band.

  • Some source dates are not recorded.
Playthrough 100

100/100, strong (70–100).

The official current terms describe Gold Coins as entertainment-only and non-redeemable and publish no playthrough multiplier. The fixed rubric places documented no playthrough in the 90-100 band.

Review date
July 31, 2026
Reviewer state
Human authored
  • Some source dates are not recorded.
Track record 68

Current first-hand record: No confirmed delivered payout. Available records do not establish a completed delivery. See source details

68/100, mixed (50–69).

Scoring rationale recorded 2026-06-19 (historical)

Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.

Review date
June 19, 2026
Reviewer state
Human authored
  • Some source dates are not recorded.

First-hand redemptions:

  • Redemption: cancelled or rejected, not paid
  • $103: cancelled or rejected, not paid
Player reviews 87

87/100, strong (70–100).

Evidence type: Public reviews. Automated draft dated July 3, 2026, not yet reviewed by an editor.

(2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.9/5 over 658 reviews (20% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/sweepjungle.com

  • Some source dates are not recorded.
Support 70

70/100, strong (70–100).

Evidence type: Public reviews. Reviewed and approved by Noah Rafkin on July 31, 2026.

A Trustpilot review mentions 'customer service is really quick to respond', and a Reddit guide describes support as 'Reliable and polite'. However, another source notes support hours are 'long but not fully 24/7', and there is a report of redemption issues, indicating some delays.

  • Some source dates are not recorded.

SweepJungle: cancelled requests and a broad promotion-abuse clause

Our SweepJungle record has cancelled requests and no confirmed delivered payout. That is a first-hand outcome, not an inference from a low score or somebody else’s review. The request with a recorded date belongs to March 17, 2026; another entry lacks a date and other details. Neither is counted as delivered money.

The September 7 review also found a material provision in the current Terms and Conditions: the operator defines Promotional Conversion Abuse beyond obvious automation or multiple-account activity. That condition deserves a closer reading before a reader assumes that meeting a stated playthrough requirement settles prize eligibility.

Cancellation did not produce a payout

Our existing correspondence records the operator saying, “Your recent withdrawal request has been canceled.” The dated attempt was returned through an antifraud process with a request to resubmit, and the coins came back. That describes what the message said and what happened to the request. It does not establish fraud by the account holder or reveal every reason behind the operator’s decision.

A returned balance is different from funds reaching a recipient. The account may again display coins available for play or another request while the original payment remains cancelled. The table preserves those attempts as evidence of the account history without using them to calculate a payout total or speed.

We do not have a matched later receipt demonstrating that a resubmission delivered. That is the missing outcome a reader should notice. It would be misleading to say the cancellation was harmless because resubmission was offered, just as it would be misleading to call a cancellation message proof of an undisclosed motive.

Technical playthrough compliance is not the whole rule

The current terms define Promotional Conversion Abuse using the pattern and economic effect of activity, including conduct the operator believes minimizes ordinary gameplay exposure while converting promotional benefits. They say it can exist even when individual steps appear to satisfy technical requirements. The definition also says proof of automation or actual profit is not required.

That is broader than a simple rule against bots or duplicate accounts. It creates a material qualification to any summary that describes the offer solely through a playthrough multiplier. The terms list potential consequences affecting promotional balances and redemption requests. We are describing the published condition; we have not established that this clause caused our earlier March cancellation.

Before relying on an offer, read its applicable rules with that provision in view. A support answer about the basic playthrough requirement may not address how a pattern of activity is assessed under a different clause. Keep the dated offer and the exact explanation for any later restriction so those questions can be distinguished.

Documents and checkout introduce separate conditions

The terms also describe identity, address, and source-of-funds checks and permit a request to remain pending while required verification is incomplete. Those checks are separate from the promotion-abuse definition. A message asking for a bank statement should not automatically be interpreted as a finding about gameplay, or vice versa.

The same document allows processing-related amounts to be included in the disclosed checkout total. Compare the final price shown for the selected payment method with the advertised package before confirming a purchase. We have no first-purchase package in our record from which to measure those adjustments in practice.

Our daily grid includes recorded zeroes

The June daily grid contains both positive observations and explicit zero values. A recorded zero is different from an unobserved blank: it tells us the logged result for that day. The mixed week does not support a fixed daily-claim amount multiplied into a monthly estimate.

We have not connected those observations to every promotion now on the SweepJungle homepage. They are account observations from that week, not evidence that a current promotion will yield a particular cash result. No daily allocation in the grid counts as a delivered payout.

General information only, not financial or legal advice. Rules, offers, and availability can change; consult a qualified professional about your circumstances.

BonusBandit editorial · updated September 7, 2026. First-hand results come from our recorded tests. Operator rules and correspondence are separately attributed and dated in these notes.

Terms and offer facts

Minimum redemption
$50 catalog median $100
States accepted
32 1 exited, listed below

Read off SweepJungle's own terms, July 31, 2026. SweepJungle Terms of Service ↗

Where SweepJungle accepts players

AK · AL · AR · CO · FL · GA · HI · IA · IL · KS · MA · ME · MN · MO · NC · ND · NE · NH · NM · OH · OK · OR · PA · RI · SC · SD · TX · UT · VA · VT · WI · WY

Exited: IN (2026-07-06). See what state exits mean for your balance.

Availability changes as state laws change. Check the tracker for your state.

Terms-of-service changes

SweepJungle's Terms of Service appear stable . No material change across the last 9 months of archived snapshots. Current terms ↗

Bonus & features

Site features as observed Jun 15, 2026 · source (sweepjungle.com) ↗ · offers change. Verify on-site before depositing.

Welcome bonus 75,000 GC + 2 SC Complete profile and get 75,000 GC and 2 SC for free Read with the rest of the site features on Jun 15, 2026. We don't date this offer separately.
Daily login bonus 0.08 SC Averaged from 7 logged observations in Noah’s daily-bonus log, log last updated Jun 20, 2026

Recurring promotions

2 ongoing

  • Daily Daily Login Reward : Daily Login Reward (no specific amounts)
  • Weekly Weekly Coinback : Weekly Coinback ranging from 1% to 20% depending on VIP level

Site features

Loyalty / VIP
SweepJungle VIP Club

What's the daily bonus really worth?

A daily bonus is free play, but its real worth depends on how hard it is to clear and whether SweepJungle actually pays out.

Payout evidence unconfirmed.

Cash projections are withheld. Coin totals assume the observed reward repeats; wagering, game returns, eligibility and redemption rules determine what can be redeemed. A factor score does not establish a wagering multiplier.

Period GC accumulated SC accumulated Cash estimate
7 days 0.6 withheld
30 days 2.4 withheld
365 days (annualized) 28.7 withheld

Coin totals are a projection from the days we logged, and they assume you claim the bonus every day. Daily bonuses change often; values shown as of 2026-06-20.

SC recorded in each of 7 logged observations. Streak escalates +0.2 SC from the first logged observation to the last
2026-06-14 (Su): 0.0 SC Su 2026-06-15 (Mo): 0.1 SC Mo 2026-06-16 (Tu): 0.1 SC Tu 2026-06-17 (We): 0.0 SC We 2026-06-18 (Th): 0.2 SC Th 2026-06-19 (Fr): 0.0 SC Fr 2026-06-20 (Sa): 0.2 SC Sa

Source: Averaged in person over 7 logged observations (2026-06-14 → 2026-06-20). See the full first-hand log. See more daily-bonus value comparisons →

Ownership

Operating entity on record: Kinetix Ventures, Inc.. That is what the corporate record and the operator's own terms show, which is not the same as knowing who runs the brand day to day.

Related brands: Kinetix Ventures, Inc. →

Score history

Every change to this operator's score, with the reason it was made:

50 70 2026-06-19: Track record 83→68 (-15), Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates. 2026-07-03: Player reviews 71→87 (+16), (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.9/5 over 658 reviews (20% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/sweepjungle.com 2026-07-31: Support 50→70 (+20) 2026-07-31: Terms honesty 53→25 (-28) 2026-07-31: Playthrough 83→100 (+17) 2026-07-31: Redemption reliability 60→60 (0) 2026-09-16: Published score 65 (today, UTC) 2026-06-19 today
Every change is logged. How the history works.
  1. 2026-07-31 Redemption reliability: 60 → 60.
  2. 2026-07-31 Playthrough: 83 → 100.
  3. 2026-07-31 Terms honesty: 53 → 25.
Show the full history (4 earlier changes)
  1. 2026-07-31 Support: 50 → 70.
  2. 2026-07-03 Player reviews: 71 → 87. (2026-07-02): player-reviews factor rebuilt from LIVE Trustpilot aggregate 3.9/5 over 658 reviews (20% 1-2 star). Deterministic rubric mapping. Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/sweepjungle.com
  3. 2026-06-19 Track record: 83 → 68. Track record reality check: no published verdict + no verified first-hand cashout + legacy-migration baseline. Operator has not earned the track-record score it was assigned by the rubric: applied -15 until evidence accumulates.
  4. 2026-06-10 Baseline published. Initial published score under methodology v1 (June 2026). Prior scores migrated from the legacy site.

Sites like SweepJungle

Each one beats SweepJungle on a single thing we can prove, and the card shows both sides of that comparison. If switching costs you something, that is on the card too. Nothing here is an affiliate link, and commission never decides who appears: the ranking is the same seven-factor Trust Score used everywhere else.

  • CrownCoins

    We have watched more payouts land

    We have watched 28 payouts land from CrownCoins, against none from SweepJungle.

  • MegaBonanza

    Better score for paying out

    MegaBonanza scores 94 out of 100 for paying out, against 60 for SweepJungle.

  • PlayFame

    Better score for honest terms

    PlayFame scores 45 out of 100 for honest terms, against 25 for SweepJungle.

Head-to-head

All comparisons →

Keep researching: every cash-out we've logged · casinos that actually paid · how redemption works · current top-rated

Report your SweepJungle experience

Cashed out, stalled, or stonewalled? Tell us what happened. No account needed, and we never publish your name. Dates, amounts, and methods are what make a report usable.

  1. You send it. It is not public, and it is not evidence yet.
  2. A person reads it, usually within 48 hours. Nothing posts automatically.
  3. If it holds up we publish it with the community reports for SweepJungle. Some reports get logged and never published.

No report changes the Trust Score. The score is computed from the seven factors, and a submission cannot move it. Community reports also stay separate from our first-hand tests, which are cashouts we paid for and recorded ourselves.

What's your report about?

Reporting on SweepJungle.

Weekly sweeps intel

New operator launches, state-law changes, and operator-side ToS edits: vetted, not regurgitated.